Seattle/ Crime & Emergencies
AI Assisted Icon
Published on April 16, 2024
Seattle's Allure Esthetic Accused of Suppressing Patient Reviews as Judge Rules for TransparencySource: Google Street View

In a decisive blow to censorship over patient testimonies, a federal judge ruled that Seattle's Allure Esthetic and its surgeon-in-chief, Dr. Javad Sajan, illegally stifled consumer speech by imposing non-disclosure agreements to prevent negative reviews. The ruling, according to the Washington Attorney General's office, found Allure's pre-service NDAs in violation of federal law guarding the right to post honest business reviews; the verdict followed Attorney General Bob Ferguson's call for action within a lawsuit spotlighting the clinic's dubious practices.

Attorney General Ferguson's battle against Allure's review suppression tactics revealed that over 10,000 patients were coerced into signing these gag orders just to receive treatment. Often, patients learned of this stipulation only after paying a nonrefundable $100 consultation fee. U.S. District Judge Ricardo S. Martinez backed Ferguson on Friday, supporting the motion for partial summary judgment on the case that focuses on transparency and scrutinizes Allure's practices. The penalty for their actions will be determined at a trial set for September.

Ferguson's lawsuit extends beyond just NDAs and dives into allegations of Allure Esthetic's further attempts to manipulate their reputation: intimidating patients to retract poor reviews, bribing them to comply, ordering staff to falsify positive feedback, and allegedly altering "before and after" photos to skew perceptions of their cosmetic outcomes. These allegations unfold a narrative that the clinic’s online reputation was artfully inflated to ensnare prospective patients in a web of deception, to the detriment of honest dialogue on patient experiences.

Amidst the uproar of corporate reputation management and the suppression of free speech, the ruling against Allure Esthetic sends a clear message: attempts to curtail the honest patient voice will not stand unchallenged. As the courtroom awaits a final decision on penalties in September, Allure's tarnished credibility raises an alarm for consumers seeking unfiltered narratives in the vital realm of healthcare services.