Phoenix/ Politics & Govt
AI Assisted Icon
Published on April 09, 2024
Former Arizona AG Tom Horne Wins Court Case Amid Forgery Claims, Faces No Charges in Separate Campaign ControversySource: Wikipedia/Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

In the unfolding legal drama around former Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne, a U.S. Bankruptcy Court judge sided with Horne against accusations of presenting forged evidence in court. Horne, who wore multiple hats as Arizona's former Attorney General and current Superintendent of Public Instruction, represented a client embroiled in a breach of contract case. This dispute began in 2021, spotlighting business owner Bridget O’Brien, whose past is checkered with allegations of fraud and nonpayment of workers. According to 12News, O'Brien was accused of using a dubious cancer diagnosis to skirt her financial duties, a claim backed by only a suspect cell phone screenshot.

The case took a turn when Michael Myrick, the Valley real estate broker who raised the lawsuit, blasted Horne for allegedly introducing a "false and forged" letter as evidence. Myrick, clearly troubled by the court's ruling in favor of Horne's client, signaled his intent to appeal. The letter in question, purportedly authored by a Phoenix naturopath, included an unverified cancer diagnosis and mistakenly bore the title "MD," prompting Myrick's forgery claims. However, the judge found O'Brien's testimony more than enough to dismiss these accusations, 12News noted.

In a separate vein, Tom Horne has dodged legal bullets shot from a different gun. The Maricopa County Attorney's Office confirmed no criminal charges would be filed against Horne related to alleged illegal campaign activities during his failed 2014 re-election bid. This affirmation came after significant delay and silence from the prosecuting office, leaving Horne under a cloud of suspicion for years. "They let this cloud hang over my head," Horne told AP News.

As Horne's career pivots with his recent role as school superintendent, the ghosts of his attorney general tenure refuse to vanish. Seeking to face these specters, Horne has continued to maintain his innocence, emphasizing both his legal and ethical probity. Despite past settlements, including a $10,000 payout in relation to civil allegations of misusing office staff for campaign purposes, Horne's narrative remains firm. He entrenched himself behind a wall of witness testimonies that cleared him of misconduct, AP News reported.

Still, with Horne's latest court victory and absence of criminal charges, controversy continues to shadow his public service, raising hard eyebrows in Arizona's legal and political circles. The saga remains punctuated by an unresolved civil investigation and a platter of unsettled fines potentially awaiting Horne's comeback. As the legal pendulum swings, both Myrick and the public eye await Horne's next move in this ongoing Arizona drama.