San Antonio
AI Assisted Icon
Published on November 04, 2024
Texas Secretary of State Rejects DOJ Election Monitors, Citing State Law Amidst Early Voting in Bexar CountySource: Google Street View

As the tension escalates ahead of Election Day in Texas, the latest clash involves the Texas Secretary of State and the U.S. Department of Justice over federal election monitoring, with early voting in Bexar County having already seen more than 570,000 ballots cast, the debate intensifies over the presence of federal election monitors at polling sites, according to KSAT.

The Justice Department informed Texas on Nov. 1 about its intention to send election monitors to ensure compliance with federal voting rights laws across multiple states, including eight Texas counties as reported by KSAT. However, Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson countered by saying that the state will not permit these federal monitors at polling locations, affirming that such monitoring would be a violation of state law, this stance was clearly stated in a letter sent to the Justice Department last Friday.

On the other side, constitutional law attorney David Coale, who not being directly involved in the issue, explained to FOX 7 Austin, "Federal election monitors have to either get permission from state agents, such as the Secretary of State in Texas, or they have to be operating under a federal court order, which does happen every now and then, but certainly isn't something that happens every day," delineating the current legal framework post the 2013 Supreme Court ruling that altered the mandate of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Adding to the narrative of state versus federal authority, Secretary Nelson assured, "Texas can be confident in the state's strong measures to ensure election integrity," according to her correspondence with the federal agency, the state's defiance comes amidst a national atmosphere of distrust, with a recent AP/NORC poll revealing that one in three Americans harbor concerns about the potential for local or state election interference which could range from ballot box tampering to more insidious forms of meddling, as per FOX 7. Coale, endorsing the state's decision and emphasizing the significance of checks and balances in this context, stated, "I think it is good. I think it shows that there's a check and a balance," said Coale. "It's very important to have checks and balances and so that no one branch of government gets a hold of the election and runs the whole thing."

As Election Day approaches, the standoff in Texas highlights a national controversy over election integrity and federal oversight. This situation reflects an ongoing tug-of-war between state sovereignty and the enforcement of national voting rights standards, with no clear resolution in sight for this election cycle.