Detroit

Michigan Lifts Ban on Paid Surrogacy, Enacts Family Protection Act to Modernize Family-Building Laws

AI Assisted Icon
Published on April 03, 2025
Michigan Lifts Ban on Paid Surrogacy, Enacts Family Protection Act to Modernize Family-Building LawsSource: Wikipedia/File photo, Canwest News Service, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Michigan's approach to family creation underwent a significant change this week with the removal of the state's long-standing ban on paid surrogacy. With the passage of the Michigan Family Protection Act, aspiring parents who previously faced complex legal barriers can now legally compensate surrogates. According to FOX 2 Detroit, Ginanne Brownell, who sought surrogacy outside of Michigan, said, "When Julie, our surrogate, gave birth to my children she also gave birth to me as a mother."

The act, which includes nine bills, aims to firmly to establish a safe and regulated framework for surrogacy. As WOODTV illustrated, the Michigan Family Protection Act facilitates ensuring parentage at birth, which is a substantial gain for LGBTQ+ families and those relying on assisted reproduction techniques. Stephanie Jones, founder of the Michigan Fertility Alliance, celebrated the victory, saying, "With this law, all Michigan families will now have equitable access to safe and secure parent-child relationships." Previously, intended parents would often have to undergo formal adoption of their own biological children after surrogacy, making the process not just expensive, but intimately invasive.

The roots of Michigan's strict laws against surrogacy began with a notorious case in the 1980s, which prompted a state-wide ban. However, as public perceptions regarding infertility and assisted reproduction have evolved, so has the law. "People have become more aware of infertility and the need for assisted reproduction to grow your family. So, I think it's just become more palatable over the years," Stephanie Jones told Michigan Public Radio. The shift comes as a reflection of Michigan's alignment with most other U.S. states, which permit compensated surrogacy contracts.

Despite the overall positive reception, some opposition remains steadfast, particularly among certain conservative and religious groups. Tom Hickson, Vice President for Public Policy and Advocacy at Michigan Catholic Conference, expressed concerns about the potential for exploiting vulnerable women, "That was the No. 1 amendment that we tried to get in was to strike the compensation aspect of this," he told Michigan Public Radio. Hickson emphasized that paid surrogacy "minimizes the dignity of motherhood and childbirth into a sale and delivery mechanism." Nonetheless, with the new regulations, gestational surrogates in Michigan must now meet age, health, and prior childbirth requirements and obtain independent legal representation to safeguard their rights.

The new legislation in Michigan sets a framework to protect the rights of intended parents, surrogates, and the children born through surrogacy agreements. The Michigan Family Protection Act has updated the state's legal landscape, providing a structured and regulated process for those pursuing surrogacy as a means of family-building.