
In apartments that rent for far more than most New Yorkers' yearly salaries, tenants say the soundtrack is less "luxury living" and more industrial whine. A group of Manhattan residents has filed suit this month against landlords and building owners, accusing them of letting rooftop ventilation fans and other mechanical gear blast high-pitched, recurring tonal noise into living rooms and bedrooms at all hours.
The complaint targets several properties across Manhattan, including 198 Avenue A, 150 Rivington and 8 Spruce Street. According to the New York Post, tenants say rooftop fans, HVAC systems and even heavy transformers produce intermittent tonal noise that pierces apartments. The outlet reports that the city's Department of Environmental Protection logged roughly 4,444 complaints and issued about 213 violations tied to rooftop or mechanical sources, and that court papers show 150 Rivington opened in 2019 and that a top-floor three-bedroom there sold for $4.38 million. The filing names landlord Flavia Cesare and several management companies and alleges chronic noise that tenants say has eroded sleep, health and the value of their homes.
Tenants' tests and health complaints
One of the lead plaintiffs, 61-year-old Nina Bovasso, says the rooftop racket has turned her three decades at 198 Avenue A into a health ordeal. She alleges the noise has worsened long-standing tinnitus, provoked sound sensitivity and triggered vertigo, and says she withheld her two-bedroom rent of $1,796.01 as the dispute escalated. "The ventilation fan has ruined my life," Bovasso told the court.
Inside her apartment, Bovasso reported interior noise spikes up to 97 decibels. An acoustic consultant working with tenants measured intermittent tones as loud as 83 decibels at 150 Rivington, according to the complaint, recurring roughly every four minutes and lasting about 30 seconds at a time. The plaintiffs argue those levels far exceed the city's indoor noise limits and say the problem has helped drive thousands of 311 complaints, per the New York Post.
Landlords say they're working on fixes; the city points residents to 311
Landlords and building representatives have pushed back in court filings, disputing how severe and widespread the problem is while saying they are addressing equipment issues where possible. A representative for 8 Spruce said the building's focus is on delivering residents an "outstanding living experience," even as tenants describe anything but peace and quiet.
The city's Department of Environmental Protection directs New Yorkers dealing with noise to report it through NYC311 and tracks service requests and violations through its enforcement channels. Tenants pursuing relief in court say they want injunctive fixes to the equipment along with damages. Landlords' lawyers, in turn, have argued in filings that some tenants mishandled communications with public officials as the dispute unfolded.
Why the case matters
The case, now active in state court, could become an early test of how New York City's noise code applies to roof-level mechanical equipment in dense Manhattan neighborhoods. Acoustic consultants caution that rooftop hardware can transmit both airborne and structural noise, which makes mitigation technically complicated and potentially expensive.
If judges or regulators side with tenants, the suit could trigger closer scrutiny of mechanical installations on both new and renovated buildings citywide, and could force owners to reckon with the true cost of placing powerful equipment just one floor above where people are trying to sleep.









