Boston

Massachusetts AG Campbell Joins Coalition to Challenge Trump's Executive Orders on Diversity and Inclusion

AI Assisted Icon
Published on May 20, 2025
Massachusetts AG Campbell Joins Coalition to Challenge Trump's Executive Orders on Diversity and InclusionSource: Wikipedia/Office of the Massachusetts Attorney General, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell has taken a collective stand with a group of attorneys general to oppose President Trump's Executive Orders that allegedly undermine diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility initiatives. As recently reported by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, AG Campbell is part of a coalition that filed an amicus brief at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit to challenge these orders in the case of National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education v. Trump.

"I am proud to join this amicus brief, with my attorney general colleagues in our continued efforts to protect lawful DEIA policies which we know reduce complaints of illegal discrimination, increase an organization’s bottom line, and improve workforce culture and consumer experience," as detailed by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Her sentiment reflects a broader concern that the Trump administration's actions could dismantle progress made in workforce diversity and equality nationwide. The controversial Executive Orders, issued back in January, directed agencies to cut ties with programs and contracts related to DEIA and pressed the private sector to follow suit.

A preliminary injunction initially prevented enforcement of the president's orders, with the District Court deeming them unconstitutionally vague. Nonetheless, the injunction was stayed by the 4th Circuit, pending a decision on the administration's appeal. The coalition, which includes 18 attorneys general, is now advocating for the District Court's original decision to be upheld and the injunction reinstated.

In the amicus brief, the attorneys general argue the importance of DEIA initiatives, claiming such programs ensure adherence to state and federal civil rights laws. They elucidate how the impugned orders could impair their states, as well as their residents and businesses, by stripping them of vital benefits and protections – such as those provided by the American Disabilities Act, the Civil Rights Act, and the Fair Housing Act. These acts have been integral to confronting discrimination and fostering better understanding across different cultures.

The legal challenge against Trump's executive directives isn't just a Massachusetts movement. States like California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington have joined AG Campbell in the fight for preserving DEIA values and policies across their jurisdictions.