Stadium operators tied to SoFi Stadium are asking a Los Angeles judge to hit pause on Pasadena’s high‑profile Rose Bowl lawsuit against UCLA while a key appeal plays out, setting up the latest legal skirmish in an already messy breakup between the storied venue and its longtime college football tenant.
SoFi Operators Push To Put Pasadena Case On Ice
Kroenke Sports & Entertainment LLC and Stadco LA LLC filed a motion in Los Angeles County Superior Court on March 2 asking the court to “stay all proceedings” in the case the City of Pasadena and the Rose Bowl Operating Company brought against UCLA while an appeal over whether the dispute belongs in arbitration is decided, according to Pasadena Now.
The filing argues that moving forward in open court while the arbitrability issue is on appeal would “irreparably” harm the defendants by forcing them to spend significant time and money litigating a dispute that an appellate panel could ultimately say should have gone to private arbitration instead, Pasadena Now reported. A hearing on the stay request is set for April 28.
How The Judge Read The Arbitration Clause
Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Joseph Lipner previously rejected UCLA’s move to send the fight into arbitration, concluding that the lease’s arbitration clause is narrow and geared toward routine, fixable performance dust‑ups, not sweeping claims that UCLA tried to terminate or walk away from the agreement, the Los Angeles Times reports.
That ruling kept Pasadena’s breach‑of‑contract case in the public eye, allowing it to proceed in Superior Court instead of behind closed doors in arbitration, the Los Angeles Times noted.
Why Pasadena Says The Stakes Are Huge
In an amended complaint, Pasadena and the Rose Bowl Operating Company allege that SoFi‑linked entities were aware of UCLA’s longstanding Rose Bowl deal but still encouraged the university to bail out, according to Daily Bruin. The filing says the resulting uncertainty has already cost the stadium a $1 million donor pledge and put planned improvement projects at risk.
The legal fight has been anything but quiet. A judge earlier denied Pasadena’s request for a temporary restraining order that would have barred UCLA from playing at other venues, and the back‑and‑forth has unfolded in public court filings and hearings, NBC Los Angeles reported.
Legal Backdrop: Arbitration, Appeals, And A Stiffer Standard
In asking for a stay, the defendants contend that federal law may require the trial court to tap the brakes under the Federal Arbitration Act while their appeal runs its course. Their argument has sharper teeth after a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision made it more difficult for courts to let trial proceedings march ahead during interlocutory appeals over whether a case belongs in arbitration, according to a Congressional Research Service summary on Congress.gov.
Exactly how that precedent applies in state‑court fights like this one is still being sorted out, but it has quickly become a go‑to citation in modern arbitration battles, Congress.gov notes.
What Happens Next In The Rose Bowl Fight
The motion to stay proceedings is set for an April 28 hearing in Los Angeles County Superior Court, and the Pasadena City Council has already huddled in closed session to discuss the litigation, according to Pasadena Now.
The defendants filed their notices of appeal on Feb. 23, which means the next several weeks will determine whether this showdown shifts into private arbitration or stays in the public glare of a full‑blown court trial. Either route carries significant financial and reputational stakes for UCLA, the Rose Bowl, and the donors who help keep the iconic stadium running, Pasadena Now reported.
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}