Chicago/ Crime & Emergencies
AI Assisted Icon
Published on December 08, 2023
Illinois AG Kwame Raoul Leads Multi-State Challenge Against NCAA's Transfer Rule, Citing Antitrust ViolationsSource: Google Street View

Attorney General Kwame Raoul is taking the NCAA to court over what he calls an "illegal restraint" on college athletes' careers, slapping the association with a federal antitrust lawsuit for its one-year waiting rule on transferring players. The rule has been under scrutiny since its inception and has sparked legal action as Raoul, together with a bipartisan group of six other state attorneys general, aims to lay the smackdown on the NCAA's regulations that sideline student-athletes for an entire season after transferring schools, except in specific cases where an exemption is granted.

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia seeks a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against the NCAA's enforcement of this "Transfer Eligibility Rule" arguing it's a convoluted policy that baffles athletes and their families. Raoul said in a statement, "The Transfer Eligibility Rule unfairly restricts collegiate athletes and is not implemented in a consistent and straightforward way that is easy for athletes and their families to understand," adding, "I filed this lawsuit to bring fairness to this flawed system and ensure the needs of collegiate athletes and their families are prioritized and respected."

While the NCAA has justified the waiting period by citing academic well-being and the preservation of amateurism in college sports, the AG's office and their coalition smell something fishy—calling out the rule's purported goals as a mere smokescreen for other, less savory, interests. They argue that such restrictions do more harm than good to the athletes, the universities, and, let's not forget, the fans cheering from the sidelines. And as Attorney General Raoul puts it, when the one-year wait eats up 20% of the athlete's full NCAA-allowed play time, it's more than a slap on the wrist—it's a potential career uppercut, impeding students' opportunities to transfer to better-suited educational and athletic programs.

Furthermore, the suit claims the NCAA's one-size-fits-all approach to transferring students effectively strips them of the transformative college athlete experience it so proudly touts. "By preventing students from competing, however, it hinders the full realization of this experience," said Raoul, according to the Illinois Attorney General's office. The case, supported by AGs from states like Colorado, New York, and Tennessee, is now set to challenge the NCAA's rulebook, which could result in a shakeup for the business of college sports as we know it.