Minneapolis

DOJ Targets Anoka for Allegedly Discriminatory Mental Health Practices Linked to 'Crime-Free' Housing Ordinance

AI Assisted Icon
Published on February 06, 2024
DOJ Targets Anoka for Allegedly Discriminatory Mental Health Practices Linked to 'Crime-Free' Housing OrdinanceSource: Anoka, MN

The Minnesota Department of Justice has struck out at the city of Anoka for what's been labeled as discriminatory practices against residents with mental health disabilities. Anoka, a suburb of Minneapolis, reportedly provided landlords with intimate medical details of renters who had multiple emergency service calls to their homes, a DOJ investigation uncovered.

The DOJ claimed that between offering weekly reports about tenants' mental health crises and the methods they may have employed to harm themselves, Anoka's actions were part of enforcing a "crime-free" ordinance designed to prevent crime and public nuisances. Anoka's Mayor, Jeff Weaver neither confirmed nor denied his active role in supporting such measures. Instead, he made no responses to requests for comment on the issue at hand, according to CBS News Minnesota.

The crux of the DOJ's censure is that Anoka's ordinance may have unfairly singled out and marginalized individuals struggling with mental health complications. "It's horrific," said Elizabeth Sauer, an attorney for Central Minnesota Legal Services, which serves low-income people, as per CBS News Minnesota

In light of the criticism and legal repercussions, Anoka, and other cities with similar ordinances are being compelled to rethink their strategies. Last year, Maryland barred evictions based on the volume of emergency calls from a residence, leading the charge on a more compassionate approach to housing policies. California has also recently rolled back on the use of such ordinances, with expected legislative pushes in Illinois and Minnesota to follow, according to a report by U.S. News.

As Anoka negotiates a "draft remediation agreement" with the DOJ, the contrast between policy intentions and humanitarian concerns remains sharply drawn. Anoka's counsel, Scott Baumgartner, confirmed ongoing discussions with the DOJ but did not share details regarding the matter's resolution, an issue undoubtedly reverberating through communities nationwide.