The contentious issue of the so-called "jock tax" is set to take center stage as Pennsylvania's Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case defending the City's ability to levy this tax on professional athletes who play games within city limits. For those out of the loop, the jock tax is a levy on the income earned by athletes when they play in a city different from the one they are contracted with, according to the city's press release.
In an announcement celebrated by City leaders, it's made clear that the battle for the jock tax's legitimacy will advance into the state's highest court. "We want our residents to know that we are doing all that we can to ensure the financial strength and security of our City," a city spokesperson said. They continue, "This is why we are pleased that the Supreme Court has agreed to hear our case defending our ability to collect the so-called jock tax." The tax will continue to be collected as the city prepares its defense, as detailed by the city's press release.
The decision by the Supreme Court to entertain this case comes at a critical juncture. Municipalities, pummeled by varied economic challenges, are searching for innovative ways to reinforce their coffers without overwhelming their residents with additional financial burdens.
