Detroit/ Sports
AI Assisted Icon
Published on September 11, 2024
Ex-Michigan Football Stars File $50 Million Lawsuit Against NCAA and Big Ten, Challenging Exploitation of Athlete Image RightsSource: Brad M, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Four ex-Michigan football stars are taking on the weighty institutions of college sports, namely the NCAA and Big Ten Network, in a lawsuit that could upend longstanding norms surrounding athletes' rights over their names and images. At the heart of the controversy, Braylon Edwards, Denard Robinson, Mike Martin, and Shawn Crable are arguing for a $50 million compensation package for years of purportedly unpaid use of their names, images, and likenesses (NIL) in broadcasts and merchandise. As detailed in a CBS News Detroit report, the group filed a class-action antitrust lawsuit that could represent a notable cohort of former players who graced the Michigan football roster before 2016.

The litigation centers on a crucial pivot in NCAA policy. Only since July 1, 2021, have players been allowed to monetize their NIL. The lawsuit alleges that institutions profited unduly before this change, while players, barred from doing the same, lost out on potentially lucrative earnings. According to a Detroit Free Press article, the players' attorney Jim Acho stated, "Michigan is the most iconic and recognized brand in college sports," emphasizing the high stakes of the suit. The NCAA, currently tangled in several compensation-related lawsuits, could face far-reaching consequences should the plaintiffs prevail, and Acho, with a history of landmark legal victories, has voiced confidence in their case.

The litigation's implications extend beyond the named plaintiffs; it embodies a burgeoning awareness among athletes of their NIL rights. Leveraging icons like Edwards, who won the Biletnikoff Award as college football's top receiver in 2004, and Robinson, known as the Shoelace quarterback, the case highlights the disparity between the earnings athletes could command in the open market versus what they received under restrictive NCAA policies. The players' aim, as reported by AP News, is to ensure future generations of student-athletes don't face the same form of exploitation.