San Antonio

Texas AG Ken Paxton Charges Ahead with Appeal Against Pfizer, Crying Foul Over COVID Vaccine Claims

AI Assisted Icon
Published on January 09, 2025
Texas AG Ken Paxton Charges Ahead with Appeal Against Pfizer, Crying Foul Over COVID Vaccine ClaimsSource: Texas Office of the Attorney General

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is not backing down on his legal contention with pharmaceutical giant Pfizer. After a district court dismissed the case, Paxton has filed a notice of appeal against Pfizer for what he claims are unlawful misrepresentations regarding the effectiveness and safety of the company's COVID-19 vaccine. The legal skirmish continues as the Attorney General alleges that the pharmaceutical company collaborated with social media to stifle critique and wrongly label truthful vaccine information as misinformation.

The dispute ignited in November 2023 when Paxton brought a lawsuit against Pfizer, asserting that the firm engaged in deceptive practices concerning its COVID-19 vaccine and actively participated in censoring public dissent. According to the official statement from his office, “Pfizer repeatedly and knowingly misrepresented the effectiveness and safety of their COVID-19 vaccine and pressured Americans to take the shot without full knowledge of the risks.” However, in December 2024, a federal district judge dismissed the lawsuit on grounds that the federal government has provided Pfizer with immunity via the Public Readiness and Emergency Act. Despite this, Paxton remains undeterred in his pursuit to continue the legal challenge.

Paxton's office seems relentless in its efforts to seek accountability from Pfizer. “When consumers questioned the effectiveness and safety of the vaccine, Pfizer sought to silence them—prioritizing profits over the truth. I will not stop until Pfizer is held accountable for deceptively pushing its COVID-19 vaccine on consumers,” Paxton elaborated on the justifications for the ongoing lawsuit. He maintains that Pfizer's actions have been motivated by profit margins rather than public welfare—a stinging indictment from a high-ranking state legal officer, as per Office of the Attorney General.