As the national debate on the intersection of education and religion escalates, Attorney General Kris Mayes and a coalition of 17 other attorneys general have presented a unified front against the establishment of what would be America's first taxpayer-funded religious charter school. This legal stance was crystallized in an amicus brief submitted to the United States Supreme Court, advocating for the justices to uphold a previous ruling by the Oklahoma Supreme Court that declared the approval of such an institution unconstitutional, as reported by Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes.
The case in question, Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. Drummond, pivots on the St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School, approved by the Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board in 2023 to function as a public charter school with a definitive religious mission. Following its approval, it was struck down the following year by the state's highest court for violating both state and federal constitutional mandates. The impending hearing by the U.S. Supreme Court later this month could have significant implications for public education systems nationwide. "Charter schools are not private schools – they are public schools," Attorney General Mayes informed in her statement, emphasizing the constitutional necessity for such schools to remain secular.
Charter schools, according to the brief, are essential parts of the public education system that must adhere to secularism as mandated by the First Amendment. These schools exist not as private entities nor as religious institutions, but as instruments to give stakeholders more influence in education while maintaining constitutional boundaries. Fundamental to their operation is the requirement to be open to all students, charge no tuition fees, and prohibit religious instruction.
The coalition's brief illuminates the precarious situation states could find themselves in should the legal definition of charter schools shift: being coerced into either providing religious instruction in public schools or dissolving charter programs completely to avoid constitutional violations. This potential quandary thrusts the responsibility of educational governance back onto state shoulders, rather than federal adjudication. Moreover, the group of attorneys general cautions that a reclassification of charter schools might disrupt the financial stability of education, as many stakeholders and states rely on these institutions being recognized as part of the public sector, preserving educational investments that amount to billions.
Arizona leads the charge with an amicus brief supported by a diverse array of states from coast to coast, including California, Colorado, and New York, underscoring the collective apprehension about the future integrity of public education in the face of religious charter schools potentially siphoning taxpayer funds. The brief reflects a shared commitment to the maintenance of a clear separation between church and state, particularly within the realms of education, where impressionable minds are shaped and taught.
.jpg){kind=link}