New York Attorney General Letitia James, joined by attorneys general from 19 other states, is challenging the federal government’s recent decision to link federal transportation funding with immigration enforcement. According to a press release by the New York Attorney General's office, the coalition has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and its Secretary, Sean Duffy, challenging directives that threaten to withhold infrastructure funding from states that do not adhere to federal immigration policies.
The DOT's announcement last month was quickly met with widespread opposition, as Attorney General James stated in the press release, "DOT’s blatant overreach threatens to divert critical resources away from public safety and undermine projects that keep our communities connected and safe." A significant portion of these resources is allocated to projects like the Federal-Aid Highway Program, which receives over $100 billion annually for highway maintenance, safety enhancements, and bridge repairs. Also at risk are crucial support systems for public transit, rail safety, and airport improvements, all vital for a state's transportation network and economic growth.
The relationship between state infrastructure and the well-being of the communities they serve is influenced by the conflict between local law enforcement priorities and federal mandates. The lawsuit argues that tying funding to immigration policy raises constitutional concerns and could affect state and local governance in fulfilling their responsibilities to residents.
Recent aviation incidents have increased the demand for consistent access to federal funds. The New York Attorney General's office referenced several events, including a fatal collision over the Potomac earlier this year that resulted in 67 deaths, to emphasize the importance of ongoing investment in safety and infrastructure. With New York potentially losing over $5 billion in DOT funding, the outcomes of this legal challenge could affect various aspects of public safety, from transportation infrastructure to air travel.
The attorneys general are united in their position, challenging the current administration’s actions as an overreach, asserting that federal funding should not be used as leverage against the states. The court is being asked to intervene, overturn these conditions, and ensure that transportation projects continue to be funded according to Congress's original intent.
