José Pineda, a 62-year-old landscaper and father from East Boston, has sued the federal government after Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents arrested, handcuffed and held him for two days, his lawyers say, despite documents that allow him to live and work in the United States. The complaint, which names ICE, asks for monetary damages for the force and detention Pineda says he was subjected to.
Lawyers for Civil Rights filed the case in federal court, saying it seeks damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act for false arrest, false imprisonment, assault and severe emotional distress. According to the complaint, ICE agents surrounded Pineda's work truck in Weymouth, forcibly shackled him, searched his belongings and took $600 in cash before transporting him to an ICE facility in Burlington. Lawyers say the arrest was the product of discriminatory enforcement.
Pineda has lived in the United States for decades and, according to the filing, holds Temporary Protected Status, has a pending asylum petition and was granted a T visa, which together authorize him to remain and work in the country. Boston.com reports that the lawsuit aims to hold the government accountable for what attorneys describe as racially motivated policing.
The complaint states that on May 27, 2025, multiple unmarked vehicles boxed in Pineda's company truck in Weymouth while five officers wearing ICE vests surrounded the vehicle. His lawyers say he was handcuffed and shackled, taken to the ICE Boston field office in Burlington and held in severely overcrowded rooms, at times with 40 to 60 people in a single space, with little access to toilets, soap or showers. The filing alleges that detainees received inadequate food and water, that lights stayed on around the clock, and that Pineda was allowed only a two minute phone call. The document is available in full through Lawyers for Civil Rights.
"I still can’t sleep," Pineda said in a statement, and his attorneys say the ordeal has left the family dealing with lasting trauma and financial strain. WBUR reported that Pineda and his wife have turned to local advocacy organizations for support while lawyers pursued the claim.
Burlington holding conditions
Advocates and local reporting have documented how the Burlington field office, intended as a short term processing site, has been used to hold people for days during recent enforcement sweeps, and some former detainees describe overcrowded and unsanitary conditions. The Boston Globe and other outlets have covered protests outside the facility and growing concern from residents and elected officials about how the site is operating.
What the suit seeks
The complaint asks the federal government to pay damages under the FTCA and lists claims including false arrest, false imprisonment, assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Pineda's lawyers say the case is intended both to force accountability for what they describe as arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement patterns and to recover the money and documents taken during the arrest.
Legal implications
The Federal Tort Claims Act waives the government's sovereign immunity for certain torts committed by federal employees, but it also imposes procedural hurdles and contains several exceptions. Among them, claimants must first present an administrative claim to the agency before filing in court, and the government can invoke defenses such as the discretionary function exception. A plain language overview from Cornell LII notes those limits and the administrative requirements for suing the United States.
What's next
With the lawsuit now pending in federal court in Boston, the Department of Justice will represent ICE and is expected to move to dismiss or otherwise respond in the coming weeks. If the case survives, it could move into discovery, where attorneys would seek internal ICE records and testimony from the officers involved. Boston.com reports that ICE briefly opened removal proceedings after Pineda's release but those proceedings were later dismissed, and local groups including Centro Presente say they will continue to stand by the family.
For residents already tense after a spike in immigration enforcement across Massachusetts, the Pineda case now shifts from a single family’s ordeal to a federal court test of whether those street stops were lawful and whether the government will be held responsible. Advocates say the outcome could influence how ICE carries out future operations and how local communities respond in the months ahead.
.jpg){kind=link}