Chicago

Springfield's Unfair Housing Law Hits the Dust, Disabled Residents Triumph in Court

AI Assisted Icon
Published on December 09, 2023
Springfield's Unfair Housing Law Hits the Dust, Disabled Residents Triumph in CourtSource: Administrative Office of the United States Courts, District of Illinois

Springfield, Illinois, has been hit with a federal hammer this week, as a U.S. District Court slapped down the city's discriminatory housing ordinance, delivering a landmark victory to advocates for the disabled. In a move heralded by civil rights champions, the city is now permanently barred from enforcing its '600-foot rule,' which has been preventing individuals with disabilities from living within close proximity to one another in small residential homes, according to a statement from the Justice Department.

Striking at the heart of Springfield's exclusionary practices, the court's permanent injunction comes after a jury previously dealt the city a financial blow in July 2022, doling out $293,000 in damages to affected residents, their families, and the Individual Advocacy Group (IAG), a state-licensed service provider. "Discriminatory zoning laws that ban people with disabilities from living in the community violate the Fair Housing Act," Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Civil Rights Division remarked, denouncing restrictive policies segregating disabled individuals.

The legal fracas began when the city tried closing down a Community Integrated Living Arrangement (CILA) home for three individuals with disabilities in 2016, despite the home being state-compliant. The Justice Department threw its legal heft behind the case in 2017, culminating in the city getting their knuckles rapped for flouting the Fair Housing Act (FHA).

The court also pounded Springfield with civil penalties to the tune of $61,982.50, leaning into the principle that persons with disabilities have a right to community integration—a stance buttressed by the Supreme Court's 1999 Olmstead v. L.C. decision. Assistant U.S. Attorney Joshua I. Grant noted the case underscored that when a basic civil right is chipped away, people nearly lose their homes, a sentiment echoed throughout the Central District of Illinois.

Besides the historical civil penalties against the city, the court tacked on fair housing training and ordered Springfield to cough up prejudgment interest amounting to $53,654.50 to IAG. It's a seismic shift in civil penalties the Department of Justice has enforced against a municipality in Illinois for FHA violations, hammering home the message of equality in housing access for all.

Tagged with ensuring the legacy of inclusive housing, the U.S. Attorney's Office, in lockstep with the DOJ, affirms its commitment to the Fair Housing Act's guarantee. As Springfield licks its wounds, a broader message is sent out — the housing rights battle for individuals with disabilities is not just being fought; it's being won.