Austin

Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick Criticizes CenterPoint Energy's $800 Million Generator Investment as Misaligned With Texas' Emergency Needs

AI Assisted Icon
Published on July 31, 2024
Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick Criticizes CenterPoint Energy's $800 Million Generator Investment as Misaligned With Texas' Emergency NeedsSource: Tony Webster from Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

In a fervent rebuke of CenterPoint Energy's approach to emergency power solutions, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick of Texas has made it clear that the company's strategy has not aligned with legislative intent or the needs of the people. Patrick's comments stem from a marathon 11-hour hearing of the Senate Special Committee on Hurricane and Tropical Storm Preparedness, Recovery, and Electricity, which delved into the effectiveness of CenterPoint's use of leased generators.

The crux of the issue is CenterPoint's $800 million investment in generators intended for emergencies—a figure sanctioned by the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUC) to be shouldered over time by ratepayers. However, these units are deemed too large to be effectively deployed in most emergencies, leading to accusations that the utility prioritized profits over practicality. During Hurricane Beryl, for instance, CenterPoint was forced to borrow smaller mobile generators from other companies to properly serve affected areas.

According to a statement obtained by Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick's office, "Instead, CenterPoint spent $800 million on massive, more expensive generators that could not be used for 99% of all emergencies but allowed them to make a huge profit." 

Moreover, Patrick emphasized CenterPoint's purported violation of the spirit of constellations of legal mandates, designed to ensure that power could be swiftly restored in tolerant scenarios. "Sen. Paul Bettencourt, R-Houston, said yesterday he will file a bill next legislative session to claw back the ratepayer increase for the $800 million that CenterPoint recklessly spent on these massive generators," said Patrick, suggesting legislative remedies are on the horizon. He also urged immediate action from the PUC, requesting a revocation of the decision allowing CenterPoint to pass the lease costs onto consumers.

Patrick's directive was clear: "Ratepayers should not have to pay for CenterPoint's lease of generators that are not mobile or helpful in 99% of the emergencies Texas faces each year." He labeled the generator lease as potential fraud and deceptive practices, underscoring a trenchant criticism towards CenterPoint's financial management and approach to crisis management.