-2.webp?max-h=442&w=760&fit=crop&crop=faces,center)
The tenure of an Oakland County Probate Court judge has been plunged into controversy following revelations that she made racist remarks and used homophobic slurs. Judge Kathleen Ryan, who handled cases involving wills, estates, and mental health laws, was stripped of her docket on August 27 after allegations of unprofessional conduct. The evidence came to light through a series of recordings where Ryan referred to Black people as 'lazy' and used an anti-gay slur against Oakland County Executive Dave Coulter, who is openly gay. AP News reported on Ryan's removal following this incident.
These recordings were handed over by Probate Court Administrator Edward Hutton, who told WXYZ-TV that he felt compelled to expose the judge's conduct, having been subjected to her harassment over the years. According to Hutton, "She's made it a living hell in the past six years. I mean, it's been terrible. It's cost me relationships. I think it's affected my health. Can't sleep." Hutton expressed that his decision to record and share the conversations was not about seeking retribution but about ensuring a fair judicial process for the people of Oakland County.
The unfiltered remarks by Ryan, described as being out of character by some of her judicial peers, have led to calls for her resignation. The Board of Commissioners Chairman David Woodward responded to the revelations with disappointment and urged the judge to step down immediately, as per The Detroit News. Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel also weighed in, highlighting the need for guardianship reform and emphasizing that the conduct portrayed goes against the core values expected of judges.
Ryan's attorneys, Gerald Gleeson and Thomas Cranmer, have stated their intent to vindicate her in the appropriate forum. Meanwhile, the Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission has been tasked with investigating the allegations, although they have not confirmed an active investigation. This is a stark departure from Judge Ryan's previously unblemished record with the commission since taking the bench in 2010. Her future in the legal system now hinges on the outcome of this inquiry and the decision of the commission.









