New York City

New York AG's Office Finds No Criminal Charges Warranted in Fatal Collision Involving Off-Duty Trooper

AI Assisted Icon
Published on December 14, 2024
New York AG's Office Finds No Criminal Charges Warranted in Fatal Collision Involving Off-Duty TrooperSource: Google Street View

New York's Attorney General Letitia James' Office of Special Investigation has recently concluded its examination into the tragic death of one Luis Morocho, who succumbed to injuries sustained during an incident involving an off-duty New York State Police trooper. The AG's office, after an extensive review of the available evidence, determined that no criminal charges should be brought against the trooper in question. According to the report made public yesterday, the collision that led to Morocho's death on August 8, 2023, could not be conclusively deemed a result of criminal negligence by the officer.

The situation unfolded as Morocho attempted to cross State Route 9 in Wappingers Falls, seemingly against the crosswalk signal. The report notes that the trooper had a green light and was driving within the posted speed limit of 40 MPH. Despite Morocho's sudden pacing change from a pause near the median to a jog into the northbound lanes, the investigation reveals that the trooper made an effort to brake and swerve in an attempt to avert the fatal encounter.

The decision not to press charges hinges on the legal necessity in New York to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the trooper's conduct represented a substantial and unjustifiable risk that was ignored—a standard the OSI believes has not been met in this case. Interviews with witnesses and analysis of body-worn and security camera footage did not contradict the findings. A preliminary breath test conducted within an hour of the collision also showed no signs of impairment due to drugs or alcohol on the part of the trooper.

The OSI's transparent breakdown of the events on August 8th makes clear the challenge in adjudicating such cases where the law demands irrefutable proof of gross deviation from reasonable standards of care, especially under the specific circumstances an officer might face. "The evidence does not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the trooper’s conduct was a gross deviation from the standard that would have been observed by `a` reasonable officer in the same circumstances," the report states, gesturing towards a bitter truth of systemic constraints that often leaves the public seeking closure with more questions than answers.