Phoenix

Attorney General Mayes Wins Court Order Against Trump Administration to Protect Federal Agencies

AI Assisted Icon
Published on May 09, 2025
Attorney General Mayes Wins Court Order Against Trump Administration to Protect Federal AgenciesSource: Wikipedia/Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America, Please attribute to Gage Skidmore if used elsewhere., CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Attorney General Mayes scored a significant legal victory recently, blocking an Executive Order by the Trump administration aimed at dissolving three crucial federal agencies. Mayes and a coalition of attorneys general from across the U.S. successfully argued for a preliminary injunction to halt this motion. According to a statement obtained by AZAG, the order will protect the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), the Minority Business Development Agency (MBDA), and the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS)—all essential in bolstering libraries, museums, minority-owned businesses, and labor dispute resolutions.

The United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island was where Mayes and the coalition managed to clearly argue, securing a win to temporarily stop the dismantling of the agencies in question. This move underscores the readiness of states to fiercely contest actions they deem harmful to public services. The agencies, which have now been safeguarded from the reach of the Trump administration, range from the IMLS, crucial for the support it provides to educational institutions, to the MBDA and FMCS, which are central to fostering small business growth and mediating labor disputes.

As the Trump administration faces ongoing scrutiny for attempts to dismantle established federal institutions, this recent injunction signifies a pushback by state-level officials invested in maintaining these services. "This is yet another example of the Trump administration trying to tear down vital federal institutions," Attorney General Mayes said in the AZAG statement. He underlined the particular dependence on these agencies in rural areas for services ranging from broadband access to job search assistance and emphasized the collaborative spirit of the multi-state effort.

The court found to likely concur with the states on their claims that not only does the Executive Order overstep the bounds set by the Administrative Procedure Act, but it also disregards constitutional mandates, as it tries to undo agencies built and funded by Congressional law. As the situation unfolds, this injunction is an immediate relief for communities that rely heavily on the services and funding these agencies provide. The collaboration of the attorneys general from states as diverse as California, Illinois, and New York reflects a shared concern over federal overreach. Together, they inarguably contribute to maintain access to cultural, educational, and business support mechanisms.