Seattle

Attorneys General Battle Trump Administration in Supreme Court Showdown Over Birthright Citizenship

AI Assisted Icon
Published on May 16, 2025
Attorneys General Battle Trump Administration in Supreme Court Showdown Over Birthright CitizenshipSource: Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

In what's shaping up to be a landmark legal battle over the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, U.S. Attorney General Nick Brown, alongside a coalition of his peers from 19 other states and the District of Columbia, have publicly fortified their stance on birthright citizenship. After presenting their collective arguments to the Supreme Court yesterday, the group sharply criticized the Trump Administration's proposal to end automatic citizenship for those born on U.S. soil. The contested notion, based on where one is born, is being labeled a flagrant disregard for constitutional law and historical precedent. As noted by Attorney General Brown, "Administrations of both parties have consistently respected that right ever since."

The well-established coalition, including attorneys general from states like California, New York, and Illinois, argues that the attempt to significantly narrow the scope of citizenship rights not only runs against the tide of over a century of legal understanding but will also likely lead to chaos and disruption across the nation. According to a statement released earlier, which is available on the Office of the Attorney General of Washington, "the President’s attempt to end birthright citizenship is patently unconstitutional." This broad coalition is prepared to fiercely defend the current understanding of the 14th Amendment.

The coalition's statement followed a dramatic day of oral arguments, with Attorney General Brown leading the charge. He stated, "We were proud to stand together to defend birthright citizenship and the rule of law at the U.S. Supreme Court today." Their message is unambiguous: any efforts by the President to override constitutional interpretations with executive actions are a clear violation of the separation of powers as defined by the U.S. Constitution.

It's worth noting that this is not the first time this issue has reached a heated pitch; birthright citizenship has been a consistent flashpoint in America's ongoing and deeply complex discourse on immigration and citizenship. But with this particular case, Attorney General Brown and the coalition are steadfast in their assertion that being born on American soil remains an irrevocable affirmation of citizenship.