
The Las Vegas police union is surveying its officers on the possibility of striking in response to a forthcoming increase in retirement contribution rates mandated by the Nevada Public Employees Retirement System (PERS). In an email leaked to 8 News Now, the Las Vegas Police Protective Association (LVPPA) outlined the potential actions ahead of the rate hike, which could reduce officers' take-home pay by over 4 percent.
Steve Grammas, LVPPA president, conveyed the urgency of the situation. "An idea we asked our members, a lot of them have asked us, can we strike? Can we do this?" Grammas told News 3 Las Vegas. He emphasized the significant financial consequences for officers, especially following a period marked by high inflation rates. The union's options ranged from a July 4 strike to various forms of protest, such as using sick leave or refusing to work post-briefing room.
The planned PERS increase would bring the contribution rate for police and fire department members up to 58.75%, up from 50%, as reported by 8 News Now. This change was decided by the board in November and affects not just the Las Vegas police but also other state employees and the fire department. With the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department employing more than 4,000 sworn officers, the financial impact will be widely felt. Grammas also stressed the need for the city and county to intervene before the planned strike action.
According to the Statements from the City of Las Vegas and Clark County reveal that while they are monitoring the situation, they noted public safety employees are prohibited from striking under state law. According to the city spokesperson, "all employees in Nevada PERS will see an increase in their contribution soon." They recognized the union's frustration but cited an agreement already in place where the "union agreed to split any PERS increase." The issue at hand is thereby not just one of union discontent but also statutory obligations and contractual agreements.
Meanwhile, the recent legislative measure extending a property tax to fund nearly 900 police positions in Southern Nevada highlights the complexity of funding public safety, balancing fiscal responsibility with the necessity of maintaining a robust police force amid calls for fair compensation. This increase will effectively negate the salary improvements granted to state police employees just two years ago, as detailed by a News 3 Las Vegas report. With the ongoing staffing struggles and the prospect of officer pay cuts, the upcoming decision by the Las Vegas police union could have significant ramifications for law enforcement operations across the region.









