
Maricopa County Recorder Justin Heap has taken a significant legal step against the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, aiming to reverse changes made to the county's election administration and resourcing, according to an announcement reported by the Recorder's official news release. Heap's lawsuit claims that his statutory authority and resources critical for ensuring election integrity have been unjustly usurped following a controversial agreement put in place by his predecessor and the Board.
At the lawsuit's core is the contention that the power to manage various aspects of the voting process was stripped from Heap due to the Galvin-Richer Shared Services Agreement (SSA) and subsequent budget decisions, "From day one, I promised the voters of Maricopa County that I would deliver more secure, more honest, and more transparent elections for all voters, regardless of political party," Heap was quoted in the announcement, indicating a firm resolve to uphold his office's legal responsibilities using all available means, including litigation.
The fact sheet provided with the announcement elucidates the particulars of Heap's final SSA proposal, which was drafted in consultation with former Arizona Supreme Court Justice Andrew Gould, indicating an organized distribution of responsibilities and restoration of statutory integrity to the election operations along with an emphasis on increased transparency and involving public input in the election planning process. Heap purports that the revamped SSA would enhance the pace of results on election days and ensure fair location availability for early voters, while also implementing more stringent Chain of Custody procedures.
Backstory to this legal battle is steeped in contention, originating when Heap's election rival, Stephen Richer, and then-Supervisor Thomas Galvin effectively reworked the SSA following the 2024 primary results with measures that severely clipped the wings of the incoming Recorder, since then, Recorder Heap has been vociferously requesting renegotiations and has purportedly sought mediation to reestablish a collaborative management of election duties, but the Board, with Galvin at the fore, has allegedly launched a misdirection campaign to sway public perception without significantly addressing critical deficiencies in their proposed SSA drafts.
Now, with no SSA in place, Maricopa County faces potential destabilization of its election operations ahead of the 2025 special elections and the 2026 general election, creating a looming risk of repeating past disruptions that have marred the county's recent voting exercises. Heap's lawsuit thus signals a pivotal moment, ensuring that the battle for election administration in Arizona's most populous county continues to unfold in the legal arena.









-2.webp?w=1000&h=1000&fit=crop&crop:edges)