San Antonio

Attorney General Ken Paxton Seeks Contempt Order Against Beto O'Rourke for Defying Court Order in Fort Worth Fundraising Case

AI Assisted Icon
Published on August 13, 2025
Attorney General Ken Paxton Seeks Contempt Order Against Beto O'Rourke for Defying Court Order in Fort Worth Fundraising CaseSource: Wikipedia/FeaturingDallas, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Attorney General Ken Paxton has stepped up his legal onslaught against Robert Francis O'Rourke, better known as Beto, with a stark move to file for a contempt order after O'Rourke's brazen disregard for a court-imposed temporary restraining order. In Fort Worth, O'Rourke declared to a crowd that the fundraising would persist, despite being legally barred from such actions. "There are no refs in this game, f*** the rules," he said, as reported in a press release from the Texas Attorney General's Office.

The legal parameters were laid out by Tarrant County’s Judge Megan Fahey, who made it clear that contempt of her order could result in up to $500 in fines and six months' imprisonment, yet Robert Francis has continued with his fundraising endeavors, purportedly to support Democrat legislators dodging a quorum, however, Attorney General Paxton is pushing for actual jail time, arguing that given Robert Francis’s "disdain" for the law and his wealth, a tougher consequence is essential to ensure compliance. Paxton's stance is rigid; he aims to illustrate that in Texas, violations have stern repercussions, stating, “Robert Francis flagrantly and knowingly violated the court order I secured that prevents him from raising funds and distributing any more Beto Bribes.  He’s about to find out that running your mouth and ignoring the rule of law has consequences in Texas. It’s time to lock him up,” as noted by the same press release. 

In the face of this escalating legal battle, the saga recalls O'Rourke’s past run-ins with the law, including a drunk driving incident, painting a picture of a figure who, according to Paxton, operates outside the bounds of legal propriety. The initial lawsuit filed by Paxton accused O'Rourke and his organization, Powered by People, of running a fraudulent fundraising operation, a claim followed shortly by a court injunction against these activities. Despite the clear directive, O'Rourke explicitly continued to engage supporters and solicit funds over the weekend at Powered by People events, actions now central to the contempt motion. 

Responses from O'Rourke and his legal team have yet to be made public.