Las Vegas

Former Clark County Official Robert Telles Appeals Murder Conviction, Citing Jury Mismanagement and Witness Exclusion

AI Assisted Icon
Published on September 01, 2025
Former Clark County Official Robert Telles Appeals Murder Conviction, Citing Jury Mismanagement and Witness ExclusionSource: Nevada Department of Corrections

In a recent bid to overturn his murder conviction, Robert Telles, the former Clark County public administrator, filed new documents with the Nevada Supreme Court. As reported by FOX5Vegas, Telles has presented claims that a crucial witness, who was excluded from his trial, could have strengthened his defense. This witness, former Seattle Police Lieutenant David T. Sweeney, would have allegedly provided testimony addressing purported flaws in a search warrant, including "numerous omissions and misrepresentations."

The intricacies of the case include arguments regarding an allegedly deadlocked jury, which Telles believes was not properly disclosed. He claimed that Judge Michelle Leavitt failed to alert the defense and didn’t provide further directions to the jury, as he was quoted as saying in the News3LV report. This led him to claim that the trial proceedings may have been compromised.

Telles sought a new trial after being sentenced to 28 years to life in prison for the 2022 murder of Las Vegas journalist Jeff German. A reported motive for the crime was German's work investigating Telles for professional misconduct, which allegedly led to Telles' loss in the 2022 Democratic Party primary. Despite DNA evidence presented in the original trial and an SUV connected to Telles spotted near German's home at the time of the murder, Telles has continued to assert his innocence. He claims he was framed as part of a conspiracy to derail his probe into the corruption in the public administrator's office.

Clark County District Attorney Steve Wolfson remained dismissive of Telles' allegations, as he was quoted by News3LV as saying, "The only conspiracy was between him and his evil mind." Wolfson adamantly refuted any allegations of a wider conspiracy, expressing confidence in the jury's decision. Meanwhile, the defense maintains that their client's fair trial rights were compromised and awaits a scheduled hearing regarding the appeal.