Detroit

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel Wins Injunction Against Federal Immigration Rule Changes

AI Assisted Icon
Published on September 12, 2025
Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel Wins Injunction Against Federal Immigration Rule ChangesSource: Google Street View

In a significant win for low-income families in Michigan and beyond, Attorney General Dana Nessel has successfully obtained a preliminary injunction against the Trump administration's latest policy shift. This move comes after a coalition of 21 attorneys general challenged what they deemed an unlawful reinterpretation of a law critical to the provision of social services. According to the Michigan Department of Attorney General, a federal court issued an injunction that temporarily halts sweeping new rules that were set to deeply impact programs aiding those in need.

The rule changes put forward by four federal agencies aimed to redefine the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA), which would have, among other things, forced states to aggressively verify the immigration status of individuals seeking access to services. This would have placed significant burdens on states and potentially led to severe cuts in funding for crucial initiatives from Head Start to community health centers. “I am relieved that this decision by the Court ensures that families in Michigan and across the country can continue to rely on these essential social services without unlawful directives,” said Nessel in a statement, highlighting the court's move to preserve current access while casting a shadow on the administration's attempted changes, as stated by the Michigan Department of Attorney General.

Since the introduction of PRWORA nearly three decades ago, administrations from both parties have allowed states to deliver important health, education, and anti-poverty services without regard to immigration status. The sudden turnabout by the Trump administration marked a stark break from this tradition, triggering alarms about the potential for wide-reaching negative consequences. The court's decision suggests that the administration likely violated the Administrative Procedure Act and the Constitution by bypassing lawful rulemaking procedures and grossly misinterpreting federal law, aa reported by the Michigan Department of Attorney General.

The decision has temporarily stopped the new rules from taking effect in the states that sued, which has been praised by supporters of low-income families. They see it as protection against major disruptions to important services. In Michigan, many programs could have been affected, including family planning and job support services that help people move out of homelessness and unemployment, as per the Michigan Department of Attorney General.