Phoenix

Pinal County Attorney Partners with ICE: Tackling Violent Crime but Sparking Civil Rights Concerns in Arizona

AI Assisted Icon
Published on December 09, 2025
Pinal County Attorney Partners with ICE: Tackling Violent Crime but Sparking Civil Rights Concerns in ArizonaSource: Shereth, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

In an announcement that has revived old concerns over local enforcement's role in federal immigration laws, the Pinal County Attorney's Office confirmed on Monday its participation in the controversial 287(g) program, a partnership forged with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), as reported by Arizona's Family and FOX 10 Phoenix. County Attorney Brad Miller leverages this program to bolster the hunt against violent offenders, explicitly targeting those involved in crimes like child and drug trafficking, domestic abuse, and he makes it clear that being in the United States illegally won't protect these individuals from the county's grasp, “we will hunt you down, no matter where you go, and prosecute you to the fullest extent of the law," Miller told Arizona's Family.

However, the partnership has already sparked fears among community advocates, fearing the lines will blur between lawful law enforcement actions and potential civil rights breaches, with Ricardo Reyes, executive director for VetsForward pointing out the fear within the community that ICE operates beyond legal parameters at times, detaining individuals before a conviction which can lead to immediate deportation, according to FOX 10 Phoenix. The contentious history of the program in Arizona, including significant legal and financial repercussions stemming from accusations of racial profiling during the tenure of former Sheriff Joe Arpaio, fails to deter Miller's confidence—as critics remain skeptical about the actual cost vs. benefit of engaging in such federal agreements.

Despite those concerns, Miller persists in his position that the partnership prioritizes violent offenders while gaining access to federal resources and additional manpower, as he explained to FOX 10 Phoenix, "Say we see a very dangerous individual who has been committing child trafficking, and he also happens to be an illegal immigrant. We now ask ICE to bring some of their team, their SWAT team, to assist us with that operation." Notably, critics counter this rationale by arguing that immigration enforcement primarily rests with federal authorities, and local involvement could undermine trust in law enforcement within communities.

As of last Friday, a total of 10 law enforcement agencies in Arizona adopted the 287(g) program, with Arizona’s Family reporting that authorities like the Mesa Police Department and the Arizona Department of Corrections participate in this task force model despite concerns; ACLU border strategist Noah Schramm elaborated on the fear of local agencies' potential to deter individuals from cooperating with law enforcement in an interview with Arizona's Family, similarly, immigration attorney Sheree Wright warns that expanding 287(g) to local law enforcement could dissuade victims and witnesses from seeking help due to the fear of immigration repercussions. Whereas the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office signals its intent to steer clear of this trend, stating its focus remains aiding prosecution efforts sans intertwining with federal immigration roles.

While the debate continues, the very fabric of Pinal County's approach to combating violent crime threads through the weave of federal immigration policies, a collaboration that County Attorney Miller endorses as a strategic tool against crime, but one that also resurrects the ghosts of legal skirmishes and civil rights challenges, years past.