Orlando

Orange County Commissioners Reject Toll Road Through Split Oak Forest Amid Advocacy for Conservation

AI Assisted Icon
Published on January 14, 2026
Orange County Commissioners Reject Toll Road Through Split Oak Forest Amid Advocacy for ConservationSource: Google Street View

In a decision that could set a precedent for how Orange County handles its conservation land, commissioners voted 4-3 against a toll road through the environmentally sensitive Split Oak Forest. As reported by ClickOrlando, the vote came following a demonstration where dozens of advocates, rallying for the preservation of the forest, gathered outside the county administration building, a move reflecting the county's resistance to the Central Florida Expressway Authority's (CFX) contentious plans, which could still lead to a legal challenge for additional county-owned land.

Advocates like Lee Perry, committed to conserving Florida’s natural heritage, have underscored the stakes involved, with Perry telling ClickOrlando, “It sets a really dangerous precedent for future conservation lands throughout the state,” and emphasizing the necessity for local control over growth as a safeguard against repeated historical missteps. Despite the state's approval for the road in 2024, and with Eagles Roost Park’s integrity also hanging in the balance, the tug-of-war over the ecological integrity of historic landscapes threatens to persist as CFX regroups.

Earlier, protesters from Save the Split Oak group had asserted their opposition to the toll road, worrying over its impact on the protected conservation land, which was bought with taxpayer money for its preservation; this vocal opposition predated the county's review of environmental concerns related to the 14-mile road proposal connecting Orange and Osceola counties aimed at alleviating traffic, according to earlier coverage by FOX 35 Orlando. Opponents also questioned the financial logic in backing an expensive infrastructure endeavor while the county is reportedly grappling with a budget shortfall, insinuating fiscal irresponsibility towards constituents.