
Boston agreed to pay $12 million to Shaun Jenkins, a Dorchester man who spent nearly 19 years behind bars for a 2001 killing he has always said he did not commit. The settlement was reached in October 2024 but stayed under the radar until it surfaced in public records and recent reporting. Jenkins walked out of prison after a judge in 2021 tossed his 2005 murder conviction following revelations of police and prosecutorial misconduct.
Settlement Revealed By Public Records
According to The Boston Globe, the city signed off on the $12 million payout in October 2024. Jenkins’s attorneys, Nick Brustin and Katie McCarthy, told the paper that the size of the deal shows Boston understood the gamble of taking the case to a jury. “The City’s settlement demonstrates it knew it faced much greater liability if the case went to trial,” they said, as quoted by the Globe. Spokespeople for Mayor Michelle Wu and the Boston Police Department did not respond to the Globe’s requests for comment.
How Jenkins’ Conviction Unraveled
Jenkins was convicted in 2005 and spent almost two decades in prison before newly surfaced records convinced a judge to grant him a new trial, prompting prosecutors to drop the indictment. In 2023, he filed a federal civil rights complaint that names several Boston detectives and accuses them of paying witnesses and concealing evidence that could have steered investigators toward another suspect. That timeline, along with the detailed allegations, is laid out in reporting and court filings reviewed by WBUR.
What The Files Showed
Documents obtained in connection with the settlement, as reported by The Boston Globe, indicate that Detective Sergeant Daniel Keeler paid at least one reluctant witness $100 the day before that person testified to a grand jury. The records also show that prosecutors failed to turn over cellphone logs revealing the victim had been in repeated contact with a drug supplier on the day of the murder.
Those undisclosed notes and call records undercut the prosecution’s original theory that linked Jenkins to the crime and became central to the court fight that ultimately led to his release. The files further show that the victim’s body was discovered in the driver’s seat of a running car near Ronan Park in Dorchester, close to the supplier’s home, a detail defense lawyers argue fits an alternate-suspect theory far better than the original case against Jenkins.
Why This Matters
Defense attorneys and wrongful-conviction advocates say the Jenkins settlement is yet another entry in a growing ledger of overturned convictions and expensive payouts tied to alleged police misconduct. Boston has already spent millions of dollars resolving misconduct and wrongful-conviction claims in recent years, according to public records and prior coverage. Reporting by WBUR has documented the scope of those costs and the political pressure they create for city leaders to settle cases instead of risking public trials.
Legal Implications
Jenkins’s 2023 federal lawsuit named multiple detectives and alleged a pattern of misconduct inside the department. By settling, the city sidestepped a trial that might have put years of investigative decisions under a spotlight in open court. The agreement resolves the civil claims against the city and the officers listed in the complaint, but it does not resolve the larger questions about how the case was built and overseen.
Suffolk District Attorney Rachael Rollins’ Integrity Review Bureau had already concluded there were “errors and misconduct” in Jenkins’s prosecution and in 2021 filed a nolle prosequi, formally ending the case, as reported by WCVB.
How Reformers Are Responding
Advocates for the wrongfully convicted say the Jenkins settlement should put fresh urgency behind efforts to overhaul how Massachusetts compensates exonerees and how police run informant-driven investigations. Lawmakers have floated legislation to update the state’s wrongful-conviction compensation system, and several bills on the topic have cycled through Beacon Hill. One example of long-running efforts to revise the statute is detailed by the Massachusetts Legislature.
Jenkins’s legal team says no amount of money can return nearly 19 years of lost freedom, but the settlement is a stark reminder of the human cost and financial burden when investigations and prosecutions go off the rails. Advocates say the case is likely to remain part of broader demands for transparency and independent reexamination of older homicide investigations.









