
A Travis County judge has cleared the way for a courtroom showdown over last year’s post-flood property tax hike, telling lawyers the lawsuit can move ahead because there are still unanswered questions that need more digging. The move keeps alive a challenge to the 9.12 percent tax increase county commissioners adopted after the July 5, 2025 storm that hammered homes and roads in northwest Travis County.
Judge Keeps Lawsuit Alive
Judge Amy Clark Meachum told attorneys in a letter that she could not resolve the case on summary judgment because of “outstanding fact questions,” according to The Austin Bulldog. The case, Saum v. Travis (No. D-1-GN-25-009885), centers on whether the Travis County Commissioners Court lawfully used a disaster exemption to adopt the higher 2025 tax rate. Her decision keeps discovery open, giving both sides the ability to demand documents and testimony before the court settles the legal issues.
Challenge Targets 9.12% “Disaster” Tax
The suit was filed Nov. 5, 2025, by Lago Vista Mayor Shane Saum and Jeffery Bowen, who argue county leaders misused a disaster declaration to justify the larger hike, according to KUT. Travis County records show commissioners adopted a total tax rate of 0.375845 per $100, roughly a 9.12 percent bump, in a public notice. The Houston Chronicle reported that officials estimated the change would generate about $42 million in new revenue.
State Law And Legal Questions
Under Texas’s post-2019 truth-in-taxation rules, most local governments can increase maintenance-and-operations property tax revenue by about 3.5 percent without triggering a voter-approval election. Certain disaster and emergency provisions can alter that cap. The Texas Comptroller explains how the voter-approval tax rate is calculated and why plaintiffs say that framework is central to their challenge.
County Response And Recovery Dollars
Travis County officials say the July storms caused “incredible” damage and that the tax move was meant to pay for repairs and future disaster preparation. The Austin Bulldog reports the county has spent an estimated $28 million plus on personnel, debris removal and repairs, and that nearly 200 households received direct disaster assistance. The outlet also notes the county worked with the Central Texas Community Foundation on relief efforts.
What Comes Next
Meachum’s letter keeps the case alive for discovery, where plaintiffs’ attorney Bill Aleshire says he will push for records showing how the disaster-tax money is being used and may seek a refund if the court finds commissioners exceeded their power. Reporting by the Houston Chronicle describes Aleshire’s plan to use discovery to force transparency and the plaintiffs’ contention that the disaster exemption applies only to direct response costs.
Local Impact
The adopted increase adds roughly $200 to the tax bill for the average Travis County homestead this year, a figure listed in the county’s public notice. Travis County materials spell out the change in the average homestead tax burden, and the litigation could determine whether those dollars stay with the county or are repaid to taxpayers.
No court date was included in the judge’s letter. Both sides now face a court-set timetable for discovery and potential motions, while county officials and plaintiffs wait to see whether documents and depositions will support spending the disaster-related taxes as planned or force money to be returned.









