Miami

Lake Park Luxury Towers Turn Into Legal Street Fight Between Developer And Builder

AI Assisted Icon
Published on July 24, 2026
Lake Park Luxury Towers Turn Into Legal Street Fight Between Developer And BuilderSource: Google Street View

Nautilus 220 was supposed to be Lake Park’s glossy new waterfront prize. Instead, the twin-tower condo has become the centerpiece of a high-stakes legal street fight between its developer and its builder, with buyers, subcontractors and lenders all stuck ringside.

Forest Development and KAST Construction have dragged each other into dueling lawsuits over the project, a 24-story-per-tower condo complex on the Lake Park waterfront. Forest fired the opening shot in mid-July in Palm Beach County circuit court, accusing its general contractor of incomplete work, water damage and withholding lien waivers that are now holding up closings. KAST hit back with its own claims and has already recorded a multi-million-dollar lien against the property.

What Forest's lawsuit says

Forest Development filed suit on July 13, alleging that KAST failed to reach substantial completion, left more than 400 punch-list items unresolved and did not properly oversee plumbing work that caused water damage, according to Boca Post. The developer’s complaint says KAST’s pay applications and change orders were inflated and points to a Claim of Lien recorded by the contractor - initially for about $14.6 million and later reduced to roughly $11.4 million - that Forest labels fraudulent.

Forest is asking the court to wipe out the lien and to award compensatory and punitive damages along with attorney fees in the Palm Beach County case.

Builder's countersuit and the lien

Two days after Forest filed, KAST answered with a countersuit that tells a very different story. The contractor alleges the developer failed to pay about $11.4 million in progress payments and that late or inaccurate change orders scrambled the construction schedule, as reported by The Real Deal.

KAST says it recorded its lien in May for unpaid labor, services and materials and has named lenders and unnamed condo owners in its counterclaim. From KAST’s point of view, it is workflow disruptions - not defective work - that explain the unfinished punch-list items and disputed invoices that now sit at the heart of the legal brawl.

What Nautilus 220 is

Nautilus 220 is a waterfront, mixed-use development featuring 330 condominium residences in two 24-story towers directly adjoining the Lake Park Harbor marina, according to Forest Development. The plans call for retail and office space, waterfront dining and access to marina slips, plus a slate of amenity areas that helped fuel an aggressive pre-sales push.

Many units were sold in advance, but the dueling claims and recorded lien now threaten the timely closings that buyers need to clear title and actually move in.

Subcontractors, buyers and liens

The fight is not just a two-party affair. Various subcontractors have recorded roughly $2.9 million in claims against Nautilus 220, and at least two condo buyers have already gone to court seeking the return of their deposits, according to The Real Deal.

That growing chain of claims - starting with general-contractor pay applications and now stretching to subcontractor liens and buyer lawsuits - can make it nearly impossible to close sales until titles are cleared or bonds are posted. Lenders and title companies usually push hard for a quick fix to avoid prolonged delays and rising carrying costs that can pile on fast.

Legal stakes for a recorded lien

Under Florida’s construction-lien law, Section 713.31, a party that willfully files a fraudulent lien can be ordered to pay damages, attorney fees and punitive awards, and courts can order liens discharged or require bonds, according to Florida Statutes. A willfully exaggerated lien can also carry criminal exposure under state law, raising the temperature well above a routine billing dispute.

Those lien remedies are likely to sit front and center in pretrial motions and any settlement talks as the two sides argue over what is legitimate billing and what, if anything, crosses the line.

Local politics and the marina

This legal mess is spilling into a broader waterfront story. Forest Development has been pursuing other high-profile work nearby, including winning a selection earlier this year to redevelop 12 acres at Marina Village in Riviera Beach. That project is already tangled in litigation over the town’s prior closed-door meetings, according to Stet News.

A long-running courtroom fight over Nautilus 220 or any related lease issues could easily complicate permitting and public support for Forest’s larger waterfront ambitions. Local officials and community groups are watching closely to see how fast the lien and title issues get resolved.

What the parties say (or don’t)

The complaint reviewed by reporters did not include an immediate response from KAST Construction, the filing notes, according to Boca Post. Forest’s filings cast the dispute as a focused fight over contract price, disputed change orders and the integrity of pay applications rather than a collapse of the overall development.

For now, both sides appear to be sharpening their litigation strategies instead of racing toward a quick settlement.

The two suits are pending in Palm Beach County circuit court. Buyers, subcontractors and lenders are watching to see whether a judge orders a narrow title cure, wipes out the lien outright or sends the parties into a longer, more expensive slog toward resolution. Expect early skirmishes over accounting, pay applications and contractor certifications in the weeks ahead as each side presses its claims and counterclaims. We will monitor the court dockets for new filings and hearing dates.

Miami-Real Estate & Development