Oklahoma City

Oklahoma Slammed With Bottom-Tier 'Do Not Move' Ranking for 2026

AI Assisted Icon
Published on July 10, 2026
Oklahoma Slammed With Bottom-Tier 'Do Not Move' Ranking for 2026Source: Wikipedia/Kerwin Moore, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Oklahoma just picked up a national distinction no state really wants: ConsumerAffairs’ 2026 ranking drops it into the bottom tier of places to move, citing weak health care and public education even as the state stays comparatively affordable. It is not exactly a tourism slogan, and it is adding fresh fuel to an ongoing local debate about whether low costs are enough to keep people here long term when key services lag.

According to The Oklahoman, ConsumerAffairs listed Oklahoma among the 10 worst states to move to in 2026. Outlets that republished the national table put the state’s overall score at about 39.96 on ConsumerAffairs’ 100-point scale. Coverage in the Wausau Pilot & Review shows Oklahoma grouped with several other Southern and Western states in the bottom ten.

Schools and health care drag the score down

Oklahoma’s low placement is driven largely by education and health indicators built into the ranking. ConsumerAffairs’ education analysis flags low per-pupil spending and weak standardized-test performance as major drags on the state’s score. On the health side, the Commonwealth Fund’s state scorecard places Oklahoma near the bottom on health-system performance, underscoring persistent problems with access and outcomes across the state. The underlying numbers come from ConsumerAffairs and the Commonwealth Fund.

Affordability still shines as the selling point

For all of that, Oklahoma remains a bargain. Cost-of-living measures consistently show housing, everyday goods, and taxes sitting well below national averages, and local economic-development boosters keep leaning on that message. State and metro analyses, echoed in national roundups of the cheapest states, say affordability is the main reason people and companies continue to give Oklahoma a look despite the service gaps. The Greater Oklahoma City economic development office and national outlets have repeatedly framed low costs as a competitive advantage in recent years, with data from Greater Oklahoma City and national lists such as Forbes backing up that claim.

What this ranking could mean on the ground

Rankings like this are snapshots, but they can shape perceptions that matter for employers, would-be residents, and policymakers. In its latest scoring, ConsumerAffairs again places Oklahoma near the bottom of its 2026 list, a pattern national outlets highlighted when they republished the study last year and one that could raise the political temperature around investments in schools and health care.

Earlier coverage of the 2025 standings in outlets such as Newsweek shows how persistent those rankings have been over time, and public-policy research suggests that closing gaps in care and education typically requires sustained investment and coordination among state and local agencies. The question for Oklahoma is whether leaders will treat this latest bottom-tier label as background noise or as one more warning light on the dashboard.