Greater Richmond/ Crime & Emergencies

Amherst County Husband Facing Murder Hit With New Abduction Charges

AI Assisted Icon
Published on October 24, 2026
Amherst County Husband Facing Murder Hit With New Abduction ChargesSource: Taber Andrew Bain / Wikimedia Commons

A grand jury in Amherst County has indicted Michael Perry III on two new abduction-related charges as he awaits trial in the killing of his estranged wife, Avriel Hooks, who vanished from Lynchburg in August 2023 before her body turned up in a wooded area off U.S. 60. The charges add to an already severe list of counts against Perry, who has spent years in custody while the case has churned through continuances, attorney swaps and his own stint representing himself in court.

The Lynchburg News and Advance reports that Perry faces two new charges centered on abduction. Perry already faces aggravated murder of a witness—not an abduction-based aggravated-murder offense—and first-degree murder in Hooks's death, as well as a charge of disposal of a dead body.

Hooks was reported missing on August 23, 2023, according to Lynchburg News and Advance. Her body was found in late August 2023 in the wooded area off U.S. 60 in Amherst County. Perry has been in custody since her body was found, and per wset.com, Hooks was reported missing from Lynchburg before her remains were discovered in Amherst County.

A Case Marked by Churn in the Courtroom

The prosecution's case against Perry has shifted significantly since it began. wset.com reports that prosecutors dropped an earlier second-degree murder charge but added the more severe charge of aggravated murder of a witness. An earlier report also indicated prosecutors dropped an unlawful disposal of a dead body charge while saying they intended to bring it back later, though the current status of that charge is unclear given the conflicting accounts in the record.

Perry has maintained his innocence throughout and has continued to deny responsibility. Perry's defense has emphasized that the cause of Hooks's death was not determined. Earlier court proceedings also saw defense attorney Bailey argue, according to wdbj7.com, that the commonwealth's case relied only on phone data and evidence that the couple had been arguing, without direct evidence tying Perry to the crime scene.

Five Attorneys, Five Continuances

The case has already had five continuances and involved five different attorneys, per the same wset.com report, with Perry representing himself since April while attorneys served in standby roles. That hybrid arrangement became a legal flashpoint: the station reports that Perry's attorneys sought to withdraw because they and the Virginia State Bar believed the dual role of standby counsel presented an ethical problem.

Perry chose to have his attorneys represent him again during a hearing described in the station's report, bringing his period of self-representation to an end after several months.

What the New Charges Could Mean Legally

Virginia law defines abduction as seizing, taking, transporting, detaining or secreting another person by force, intimidation or deception, without legal justification, with intent to deprive that person of liberty or to conceal them from someone legally entitled to their custody, according to Virginia Code § 18.2-47. Abduction committed with intent to defile is punishable as a Class 2 felony under Virginia Code § 18.2-48.

Separately, Virginia statute classifies the willful, deliberate and premeditated killing of a person during an abduction as aggravated murder, a Class 1 felony, only if the abduction was committed with intent to extort money or a pecuniary benefit or with intent to defile the victim, according to Virginia Code § 18.2-31. Perry's existing aggravated-murder charge is for the murder of a witness, not an abduction-based offense.

Trial Tentatively Set for April

Perry awaits a trial tentatively set for April 5 in Amherst Circuit Court, according to the Lynchburg News and Advance report on the new indictments. The case has moved through multiple proposed trial dates over the past two years, and the current April setting follows the long history of continuances and representation disputes that have defined the proceedings so far. No additional details about the circumstances leading to the current schedule were available in the dossier of court reporting reviewed for this story.