Sacramento/ Crime & Emergencies

Ex-SacRT Bus Driver Convicted After Bus Cameras Contradict Her Assault Claim

AI Assisted Icon
Published on October 01, 2026
Ex-SacRT Bus Driver Convicted After Bus Cameras Contradict Her Assault ClaimSource: Ken Lund / Wikimedia Commons

A former Sacramento Regional Transit District bus operator was convicted this month of lying about being assaulted on the job, after investigators determined that surveillance footage from her own bus undercut her account. A jury found Rona Christina Means guilty on September 14 of one felony and two misdemeanors tied to false statements she made to obtain insurance and workers’ compensation benefits.

According to the Sacramento County District Attorney’s Office, Means claimed she was assaulted and repeatedly punched by a passenger on July 25, 2018, and later sought workers’ compensation benefits for her injuries. She worked as a SacRT bus operator at the time she says the attack happened, and officials say she pursued benefits tied directly to that reported incident.

Jurors ultimately convicted her of felony presenting a false or fraudulent insurance claim, along with misdemeanor counts of presenting false or misleading information in support of an insurance claim and making a knowingly false or fraudulent statement to obtain workers’ compensation benefits, as FOX40 reported.

Cameras Told a Different Story

The case unraveled after the California Department of Insurance opened an investigation, interviewing Means herself along with other SacRT employees, doctors and the insurance company involved, per the district attorney’s office. Investigators also pulled bus surveillance video from multiple camera angles, and that footage did not support Means’ claim that she was repeatedly punched or otherwise attacked.

The mismatch between her account and what the cameras captured became central to prosecutors’ case, according to the same account from the district attorney’s office. Beyond confirming the conviction, the DA’s office did not detail exactly what the footage did show, only that it contradicted her version of events.

What Means Faces at Sentencing

Means now faces a maximum potential sentence of five years in prison and two years in county jail, the district attorney’s office says. She also faces approximately $45,500 in victim restitution, though the office’s announcement does not indicate what sentence or restitution amount a judge will ultimately impose.

Sentencing has been scheduled for October 23 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 9D before Judge Allison Williams, per the district attorney’s office. Until then, the maximum exposure outlined by prosecutors stands as the ceiling for whatever punishment follows.

Workers’ compensation fraud cases like this one feed into a much larger, costlier pattern across the state. The California Department of Insurance has estimated that such fraud costs California between $1 billion and $3 billion annually, part of a $30 billion nationwide problem, though those figures are broader estimates rather than numbers tied specifically to the Means case.