
Rural Hall voters threw out their mayor and a sitting council member on Tuesday, delivering a clear verdict on a data center fight that had consumed the small Forsyth County town for most of 2026. Unaffiliated candidate and former council member Susan Hawks Gordon reclaimed the mayor's seat from Republican incumbent Terry Bennett, while incumbent council member Mark Lane lost his seat to unaffiliated challenger Michael Woodcock.
Gordon's win came by a comfortable margin, with unofficial results showing her at 51.6% to Bennett's 34.8%, according to a live-updates tally from 88.5 WFDD. It was a rematch of the 2023 mayoral race, which Bennett won and Gordon lost, making Tuesday's result a reversal of fortune about three years in the making. Lane's loss to Woodcock was closer, with WFDD reporting the incumbent council member fell by just four votes.
A Town Divided Over a Massive Project
The election outcome capped months of heated debate in Rural Hall over a proposed data center, according to WFDD, whose reporting on the race was authored by senior reporter and editor April Laissle. The fight began in April when the Town Council unanimously adopted a resolution opposing the project, according to Forsyth Dems NC.
That opposition did not last. Two months later, in June, the council reversed course and voted to support the project after the developer offered new commitments, per WHQR. Mayor Bennett said at the time that the developer had promised Rural Hall could eventually annex the site, bringing it into town limits and allowing the town to collect tax revenue if the project moved forward and Forsyth County approved rezoning. The same WHQR report noted that developers had increased site setbacks and reduced the number of buildings in the complex following the council's initial vote against it.
County Commissioners Rejected the Rezoning
The reversal did not sit well with critics, who accused Rural Hall town leaders of selling out, according to WFDD's reporting on the election. The project, known as Project Iron Spur, ultimately never got off the ground anyway: Forsyth County commissioners rejected the proposed rezoning in a 5-2 vote on July 30, WFDD reported separately. Residents and the county planning board had opposed the plan, citing concerns about environmental impacts, noise and property values.
The precise size of the parcel at the center of the dispute is murky in local coverage. WFDD's report on the commission vote described it as roughly 129 acres of land across from the town hall, while the Winston-Salem Journal described it as a 128-acre parcel. Either way, the Forsyth County Board of Commissioners' rejection of the rezoning effectively killed the project for now, even as the political fallout from the town's handling of it played out at the ballot box months later.
Part of a Bigger Backlash Statewide and Beyond
Rural Hall's upheaval fits a pattern playing out across North Carolina, where data centers have become what The Charlotte Observer called a flashpoint in the state's 2026 elections, with candidates staking out positions on moratoriums, utility costs and local control. A recent Elon University poll found the sentiment driving that politics: 44% of 800 people surveyed opposed having a data center in their community, compared to just 24% who supported one, with 32% unsure, according to WUNC.
WUNC's reporting found that elected officials perceived as insufficiently opposed to data center projects have faced real political consequences elsewhere in the state. In Edgecombe County's sixth district, anti-data-center candidate David Batts unseated four-term incumbent Donald Boswell in a March Democratic primary, 337 votes to 162. Rural Hall's own experience sits alongside Stokes County, where commissioners narrowly approved a $10 billion data center project over significant resident opposition and were later sued by community members and environmental groups, and Apex, where a developer withdrew a planned data center after residents pushed back, per the same WUNC report.
The backlash was not confined to North Carolina on Tuesday. Stateline reported that 33 ballot measures to restrict data centers had passed or were leading in vote counts late Tuesday evening, while a separate tally from The Washington Post found voters in at least 38 jurisdictions nationwide had passed bans or restrictions on data centers that day. For Rural Hall, the message from its own voters arrived through a different mechanism entirely: not a ballot measure, but the ousting of the officials who had wavered on the question.









