Jury selection has begun in the high-profile federal corruption trial of former Chicago Alderman, Edward Burke. The city is scrutinizing its political habits once more as the concept of aldermanic prerogative—a non-codified power that allows aldermen to make independent decisions within their wards—is brought to light. According to the Chicago Tribune, the case revolves around the allegation that Burke used this privilege to conduct non-ethical practices during his extensive tenure.
Edward Burke, who had been an influential figure in the City Council for more than 50 years, is facing a six-week trial. The 79-year-old former Finance Committee chair, has been allegedly using his position to run the council like a personal empire. The trial will include secretly recorded meetings and phone calls that apparently depict Burke using his office for personal gain, particularly in assisting his private law firm, as per the Chicago Tribune.
Burke's legal team, on the other hand, argues that his actions were taken out of context. They believe high volumes of work and calls led to misinterpretation of intent, stating his behavior to be nothing more unusual than regular political tactics, as per a Hoodline report. The defense will most likely focus on discrediting former Alderman Daniel Solis, an FBI informant, who himself was previously imprisoned for corruption, before he started covertly recording Burke and others.
