Boston
AI Assisted Icon
Published on February 08, 2025
Massachusetts AG Leads Charge Against Musk and Trump Admin Over Alleged Financial Data Snooping!Source: Wikipedia/Office of the Massachusetts Attorney General, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell has forcefully stepped up to challenge the Trump Administration's decision to allow the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), steered by none other than tech tycoon Elon Musk, to have what has been called unauthorized access to a treasure trove of Americans' private financial data. This move has spurred a coalition of 19 attorneys general into legal action, as they rally to safeguard these sensitive details from prying eyes.

According to a statement obtained by the Massachusetts Attorney General's office, since February 2, the Treasury Department adopted a hotly debated policy to grant "special government employees", including Musk, unprecedented access to its central payment system—handled by the Bureau of Fiscal Services (BFS)—that could seriously alter the flow of essential federal funds. This policy has been perceived by many as a breach of traditional security protocols which traditionally have limited access to a tight-knit group of career civil servants.

Nevertheless, the challenges do not stop at privacy concerns. AG Campbell has raised the alarm that this move might also allow the likes of Musk and his team to unilaterally freeze funds that are meant for public services—a power that many within the coalition claim he simply does not possess. "The President does not have the authority to disclose private information or block a federal payment whenever he wants, and he has even less authority to give an unelected billionaire that power," Campbell stated.

The lawsuit aims to push back hard against what is seen as an encroachment on the rights of individuals and states alike. The coalition is seeking to not only stop DOGE from wielding this new-found access but also to declare outright that the policy change thrust upon BFS is unlawful and unconstitutional. The unauthorized reach extends over bank accounts, tax specifics, and even Social Security numbers, creating a broad spectrum of potential risk to citizens' privacy.

Eighteen other states joined Massachusetts in this legal bout, presenting a united front against what they see as an overreach of executive power. By challenging the authority of the President and his administration's discretion in sharing this sensitive information with DOGE and Musk, these attorneys general are making a concerted effort to protect public welfare—and the mechanisms that safeguard the transactional integrity and privacy of millions.