New York City

New York City Real Estate Executives Accused of Buying Political Favor in Mayoral and Council Races

AI Assisted Icon
Published on May 08, 2025
New York City Real Estate Executives Accused of Buying Political Favor in Mayoral and Council RacesSource: Google Street View

In a landscape where political support and real estate interests intermingle, recent financing revelations have raised eyebrows across New York City's political scene. The "Fix the City" PAC, staunchly backing Andrew Cuomo’s mayoral campaign, has attracted at least $410,000 from real estate executives facing lawsuits from the city for alleged disrepair in their apartment buildings, according to a Gothamist review. High-profile donors include Peter Fine and A&E Real Estate Executive Chair Douglas Eisenberg, with accusations that their contributions are attempts to gain favorable treatment should Cuomo claim victory in the mayoral race, this raises the specter of influencers shaping policy by pouring cash into electoral politics.

While lawsuits pile up against the landlords, Cuomo's campaign juggernaut rolls forward, buoyed by significant financial support; as "Fix the City" racks up over $6.2 million, tenants like Dejohn Kornegay grapple with dangerous living conditions and a reminder that political influence often casts a long shadow over the fight for habitable housing. "It's getting worse," Kornegay lamented to Gothamist, discussing the deteriorating environment of his Bronx apartment, a sentiment echoed in echoes of disrepair heard across the city, raising doubts about the true priorities of would-be political benefactors.

Meanwhile, the Real Estate Board of New York (REBNY), not to be outshined in the realm of political contributions is making its intentions known with a sizable influx of cash aimed at influencing City Council races; their eye is particularly trained on ousting Brooklyn Council member Alexa Avilés. The independent expenditure committee, Jobs for New York, has already funneled $45,000 into ads in favor of Avilés' opponent, Ling Ye, setting a precedent for real estate-powered electoral strategies, it's a numbers game for those with the deepest pockets, with real estate interests aiming to align the city's leadership more closely with their visions of development and governance.

Avilés, a figure of contention amidst the real estate community for her staunch progressive stances and numerous clashes over city land use, currently faces a concerted effort from heavy-hitting firms like Extell Development and RXR, as reported by The Real Deal; these companies, amongst others, each contributing $45,000 to the Jobs for New York PAC, see Avilés as obstructionist to their intents. On the flip side of this monetary coin, proponents of tenant rights watch warily as the scales of political influence seem to tip in favor of those with the deepest pockets versus those in need of stable, affordable homes.

With real estate executives having poured over $2 million into Cuomo's related mayoral PAC, and REBNY's strategic infusions in council races, the question of fair representation looms large over the New York political landscape. Residents of buildings marred by violation after violation, like the issue-riddled properties in the portfolio of A&E, have a firsthand understanding of the stakes involved—it's not just about electoral outcomes, but the daily realities that define the term 'livable conditions,' as property owners scramble to sway opinions and cement their standing in the political arena.