Boston

AG Campbell Leads 20-State Coalition to Defend Noncitizen Students' First Amendment Rights

AI Assisted Icon
Published on October 16, 2025
AG Campbell Leads 20-State Coalition to Defend Noncitizen Students' First Amendment RightsSource: Wikipedia/Office of the Massachusetts Attorney General, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell has taken a stand to safeguard First Amendment rights for noncitizen students and faculty. Leading a coalition of attorneys general from 20 states, Campbell co-filed an amicus brief supporting The Stanford Daily in their lawsuit challenging what has been labeled the "Ideological Deportation Policy" by the current administration. This move comes as the student-run newspaper at Stanford University faces direct consequences from Executive Orders 14161 and 14188 issued by President Trump, which have effectively instilled a climate of fear among international journalists on campus.

The orders in question explicitly compel federal agencies to closely monitor, detain, and potentially deport noncitizen students and faculty members who dare to express dissenting political views. "No student, regardless of immigration status, should live in fear of deportation or retaliation by the federal government simply for expressing an opposing political view or belief," AG Campbell stated, as reported by the Massachusetts official news release. The briefing aims to not only address this policy but also to highlight the critical contributions of immigrant students and faculty to local economies and academia.

The Trump administration's policies have tangibly impacted behavior, with reports of international student journalists declining assignments, removing their bylines, or even resigning to sidestep jeopardy to their residency status. As per the Massachusetts government release, the ripple effects include reduced international student attendance at conferences, a decline in class participation, and in extreme cases, students withdrawing from their courses entirely. These actions reflect a broader sentiment underpinning the educational sector's concern for its international population.

The coalition's defense is robust, articulating that the policy not merely infringes upon basic rights to free speech but also undermines higher education's very purpose. AG Campbell and peers are positing that if the policy is permitted to stand by the courts, it will severely impair the states' abilities to attract and retain the diverse talent that fuels economic and intellectual growth. This argument draws upon a recent judgment by the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts, which affirmed First Amendment protections to be equally applicable to citizens and law-abiding noncitizens alike, thus underscoring the potential for legal precedent to shift in favor of the coalition’s stance. AG Campbell's leadership, joined by colleagues from states including but not limited to California, Washington, Arizona, and New York, signifies more than a legal challenge.