Boston

Massachusetts AG Triumphs as the Trump Administration’s Attempt to Eliminate Federal Agencies Is Thwarted by a US District Court

AI Assisted Icon
Published on November 23, 2025
Massachusetts AG Triumphs as the Trump Administration’s Attempt to Eliminate Federal Agencies Is Thwarted by a US District CourtSource: Wikipedia/Office of Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

In a decisive legal skirmish over the proposed dismantling of four federal agencies, Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell emerged victorious. According to a recent announcement on mass.gov, a US District Court has sided with AG Campbell and a coalition of 20 attorneys general, handing them a summary judgment that effectively halts the Trump Administration's plans to erase four pivotal federal entities.

The court's decision now prevents the Administration from attempting to, perhaps illegally, disband agencies including the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), the Minority Business Development Agency (MBDA), the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS), and the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness (USICH). Back in April, AG Campbell joined forces with other states to sue the Administration over an Executive Order that sought to eliminate these agencies, which are integral to various societal and economic sectors. The preliminary injunction obtained in May was just the beginning of AG Campbell's efforts to ensure these agencies' survival.

"Massachusetts is home to some of the best public libraries and museums in the country that employ residents, provide educational opportunities and resources, and drive our creative economy," AG Campbell stated, emphasizing the significance of the cultural institutions and other services safeguarded by the agencies in question. She vowed to "continue to hold the Trump Administration accountable for unlawful actions that harm our state," as mentioned on mass.gov.

Arguments presented by AG Campbell and her fellow attorneys general claimed the Executive Order was not only unconstitutional but also contravened the Administrative Procedure Act by trying to undermine Congress's authority. The final ruling, delivering a blow to the Administration's efforts, declared the proposed actions unlawful and barred the Administration from taking steps to carry out the order's intended agency dismantling. The suit, which originally focused on three agencies, was amended in June to include USICH after it too was targeted by the same Executive Order.

The lawsuit brought against the Trump Administration's Executive Order was a unified effort involving attorneys general from Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawai'i, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin.