Kansas City

Feds Say Lee's Summit Money Man Ran $2 Million Ponzi Play

AI Assisted Icon
Published on July 21, 2026
Feds Say Lee's Summit Money Man Ran $2 Million Ponzi PlaySource: Google Street View

Federal regulators say a 29-year-old Lee's Summit financial representative turned short-term investments into a long-term nightmare, accusing him of running a Ponzi-style setup that pulled in more than $2 million from investors.

According to court filings, Trevor Uhls is now facing a civil enforcement action in federal court, and a judge has already signed a temporary restraining order aimed at locking down assets while the case plays out. Prosecutors say many investors who thought they were signing on for quick, rich returns have instead seen little or none of the interest or principal they were promised. The complaint is pending in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

What prosecutors say

Court documents and local reporting state that Uhls offered promissory-note contracts that promised returns of 10 to 15 percent after 30, 60 or 90 days, and told investors they could roll over their money and receive monthly interest payments. Prosecutors allege that most investors received only a few interest payments at best, and that several have been unable to recover their original investments, according to KCTV.

Federal complaint and freeze

The United States filed a civil complaint on July 16 under the fraud-injunction statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1345, seeking injunctive relief and asking the court to block transfers and preserve assets while the matter is resolved. Docket records show the government has also requested a preliminary injunction and that the case has been reassigned to District Judge Stephen R. Bough; responses to the government’s motion are due July 30. Those filings and deadlines appear in online court records, as reflected in Justia Dockets.

Regulatory action

Separate from the court case, FINRA accepted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in May that bars Uhls from associating with any FINRA member firm. The letter states that Uhls refused to produce financial and telephone records that the regulator requested under Rule 8210 during an inquiry into the unauthorized sale of promissory notes. His refusal resulted in a bar from the securities industry, adding regulatory pressure alongside the government’s civil action, according to FINRA.

Lee's Summit has seen similar cases

Lee's Summit residents have seen this script before. In 2010, a separate Ponzi prosecution led by the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the FBI left investors more than $1.8 million out of pocket, a reminder of how badly local investment pitches can go when they cross the line into fraud. That earlier case ended in guilty pleas and restitution orders and illustrates why federal authorities move quickly to lock down assets when they suspect a scheme. Details of that prior case appear in an archived press release from the FBI.

What it means for investors

The temporary restraining order in the Uhls matter is designed to keep money from disappearing while officials review financial records and consider next steps, which could include appointing a receiver or pursuing restitution for investors. Regulators use these tools to preserve what is left for victims, and FINRA provides public resources on filing complaints and checking a broker’s registration status. Anyone who invested with Uhls is advised to gather account statements, correspondence and any promissory-note agreements, and to consider contacting the U.S. Attorney’s Office or FINRA’s helpline for guidance, as outlined in materials from FINRA.

The case remains in its early civil phase. The government still has to convince the court that a longer-term injunction is warranted before the matter moves forward, and criminal charges could follow if investigators uncover evidence of felonious conduct. According to the court docket, the government’s response deadline is July 30, 2026, and the judge will decide whether to convert the current temporary restraints into more durable relief. Court records and local reporting will show the next moves in the case, as noted in Justia Dockets.