Salt Lake City/ Crime & Emergencies

Judge Tosses Lawsuit Over Man's Death in Jet Engine at SLC Airport

AI Assisted Icon
Published on October 17, 2026
Judge Tosses Lawsuit Over Man's Death in Jet Engine at SLC AirportThird District Court — Site of Lawsuit Dismissal
Google Street View

A Utah judge has dismissed with prejudice the lawsuit filed by the parents of Kyler Efinger, the 30-year-old man who died after climbing into a running jet engine at Salt Lake City International Airport in January 2024. Judge Heather Brereton signed the order Oct. 16, 2026, ruling that Salt Lake City owed no special legal duty to Efinger beyond what it owes the traveling public at large.

Court Grants City's Motion to Dismiss

The ruling, first reported by KUTV, means Judd and Lisa Efinger cannot refile their case against the city. Brereton granted Salt Lake City's motion to dismiss, finding that the allegations, even if proven true, would not entitle the family to relief, according to abc4.com. The court accepted the complaint's factual allegations as true for purposes of deciding the motion but still found no legal path forward for the family's claims.

Brereton applied what is known as the public duty doctrine, concluding the city's alleged failures involved obligations owed broadly to airport users rather than a special duty owed individually to Efinger. “They do not, however, have special obligations to any one individual beyond that,” the judge wrote, per abc4.com's report. The court also found that the complaint did not establish a special relationship between Salt Lake City and Efinger that would create an exception to that doctrine.

What the Lawsuit Alleged

Judd and Lisa Efinger, representing their son's estate, filed suit on Dec. 30, 2025, alleging wrongful death, negligence and premises liability. According to the Salt Lake Tribune, the family claimed the city failed to maintain safe and secure premises at the airport. The complaint further alleged that staff were not adequately trained to respond to behavioral and mental-health emergencies, and that the city failed to coordinate a timely search once Efinger left a secured area.

The Tribune's report also detailed claims that airport officials should have been immediately notified which emergency exit had been opened, and that police received incorrect information while searching for Efinger. A related account from Gephardt Daily said the lawsuit alleged emergency exit doors lacked delayed-locking systems and that city personnel did not notify nearby pilots in a timely manner about a disoriented person near the deicing area and taxi lane. The suit sought damages exceeding $300,000 and had requested a jury trial, with claims for pre-death pain and suffering and loss of companionship alongside the wrongful-death and premises-liability counts.

How the Night Unfolded

According to the complaint, Efinger passed through airport security and began experiencing a manic episode around 9 p.m. on Jan. 1, 2024. He went through an emergency exit to reach the airport ramp area, crossed approximately a mile of active airfield, and climbed into the running engine of an Airbus A220-100 that had begun taxiing from a deicing pad. He died from his injuries and was pronounced dead at the scene.

Court filings indicate the plaintiffs submitted body-camera footage as part of their case, though the dismissal order did not turn on a review of that footage. Airport officials previously said the facility is monitored by about 3,000 cameras covering nearly every square foot of the grounds, according to KJZZ. That same report cited airport officials stating it took about ten minutes from when Efinger opened the emergency door until personnel reached him inside the engine.

Airport's Defense of Its Security Design

Airport director Bill Wyatt has defended the facility's emergency exit design, telling KJZZ that the doors cannot be locked closed because people need to be able to get out immediately in the event of a fire, explosion or active shooter situation. Wyatt also said officials planned to add more cameras, technology and security staff as the airport continues to expand, per the same report.

The dismissal with prejudice closes the door on the Efinger family's civil case against Salt Lake City, leaving the public duty doctrine as the deciding legal barrier in a tragedy that unfolded over roughly a mile of active airfield nearly three years ago.