Miami

Miami Commissioner Joe Carollo Faces Lawsuit Seeking Removal Over Alleged Abuse of Power

AI Assisted Icon
Published on January 17, 2024
Miami Commissioner Joe Carollo Faces Lawsuit Seeking Removal Over Alleged Abuse of PowerSource: Miami Gov

Miami's Commissioner Joe Carollo is fighting to stay in office as local businessmen, Bill Fuller and Martin Pinilla, have filed a court complaint aiming for his removal. Fuller and Pinilla, the entrepreneurs behind the Little Havana hotspot Ball & Chain, are taking legal action after a successful multi-million-dollar verdict against Carollo, as reported by NBC6 Miami. Their attorney, Jeffrey Gutchess, expressed that their action is in the interest of the Miami citizenry, stating "So since that is the official public policy of the city and the official law of the city, we thought it appropriate to file this complaint, asking a judge to make that declaration."

The lawsuit is grounded on allegations that Carollo used the city’s enforcement apparatus to target the businessmen's operations as a form of political reprisal. Accused of wielding the powers of law enforcement against Fuller and Pinilla for backing his political opponent, Carollo has been hit with a substantial judgment—north of $63 million as per the ruling of a federal court. This financial blow seeks to compensate for what the jury deemed as a violation of First Amendment rights, according to details from Local10.

In the face of these accusations, Carollo remains resolute in his innocence. "It is evident that they are extremely upset that they have not been able to bring me down while I continue to do my honest role and commitment as a public servant," Carollo stated. This response comes in the wake of the court's directive to seize Carollo's assets and garnish his earnings, a punitive action aimed at enforcing the multi-million-dollar award.

The legal strife hinges on the Miami City Charter's "Citizens' Bill of Rights," which explicitly states that a public official found by the court to have willfully violated its statutes must "forthwith forfeit his or her office or employment." Fuller and Pinilla's legal offensive is predicated on this very clause, suggesting that Carollo's conviction under this bill is cause enough for his prompt removal from office. With this case, the businessmen's legal team hopes to turn the tide of their protracted struggle against an elected figure who, they contend, has stepped beyond the bounds of his authority and into the territory of personal vendetta.