Cincinnati

Community Groups Sue Federal and State Agencies Demanding Environmental Review of Brent Spence Bridge Expansion Project

AI Assisted Icon
Published on October 17, 2024
Community Groups Sue Federal and State Agencies Demanding Environmental Review of Brent Spence Bridge Expansion ProjectSource: Google Street View

A legal battle is mounting over the Brent Spence Bridge Corridor project, as several local organizations have filed a lawsuit against federal and state agencies. Represented by groups including the Devou Good Foundation, Queen City Bike, and other regional entities, the lawsuit disputes the Federal Highway Administration's May finding that the project would not have significant environmental impacts.

The suit, which brings together various community stakeholders, holds at its core concern the fear that minority communities might bear the brunt of the adverse outcomes, such as increased air pollution, noise pollution, flooding, and the destruction of habitats for endangered species. According to FOX19, these groups call for a complete environmental impact statement to rigorously evaluate the implications of expanding the bridge from eight lanes to 16.

The lawsuit, details of which Local12 shared, emphasizes that such an assessment could lead to a redesign of the project to be more environmentally considerate and may still allow room for necessary changes.

The impetus for demanding an environmental impact statement aligns with the groups' perspective that not enough consideration has been given to how the project could affect land, air quality, traffic, stormwater, and other factors. "Put people over pavement," a phrase used in a press release and on the campaign site called People Over Pavement, captures the essence of what these constituents advocate, "The (existing) bridge does need to be fixed," spokesperson Mackenzie Mason told The Enquirer, indicating the groups are not against the project outright, but seek more prudent planning.

The lawsuit's list of defendants includes the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Ohio Department of Transportation, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, their respective top administrators, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Cincinnati. The ongoing legal situation has led to officials withholding comments, with the U.S. Department of Transportation declining to make a statement. The collective action of these groups reflects a push for a more sustainable and equitable consideration of infrastructure development, prioritizing long-term environmental health alongside transportation efficiency.