In what appears to be a controversial shift in rhetoric, New York City Mayor Eric Adams has ignited concern and critique after suggesting that undocumented immigrants are not entitled to due process under the Constitution. During a press briefing, Adams, who is currently facing felony corruption and bribery charges, sought to contrast his legal predicament with that of individuals who entered the country without authorization, as reported by Latin Times.
"The Constitution is for Americans," Adams stated, according to Latin Times, prompting swift rebuke from immigration advocates and legal experts. In light of his own legal troubles, the Democratic mayor—who is entangled in a federal case—highlighted a perceived difference between the rights afforded to him and those granted to someone who "snuck" into the country.
Mayor Adams' comments have drawn backlash, notably from Rep. Nydia Velázquez and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. "This type of misinformed rhetoric is embarrassing and does nothing to help New Yorkers," Velázquez told Gothamist in a statement. Ocasio-Cortez also corrected the mayor, saying, "This is a land of due process and America is a country of due process and we afford due process to all human beings who are within our borders."
Mayor Adams has further drawn attention by expressing a desire to reconsider the city's sanctuary laws, as per his earlier comments that he favors rolling back the 2014 sanctuary law after two high-profile crimes involving migrants. These laws, enforcing due process before turning undocumented immigrants over to federal authorities, may find their protections diminished if Adams' suggestions lead to legislative change. Nevertheless, echoing statements obtained by Gothamist, Adams said, "Our Constitution is for all of us," indicating an intent to adhere to due process for undocumented immigrants, in spite of his earlier claims.
Adams has been increasingly seen as aligning with President-elect Donald Trump's immigration enforcement rhetoric, and his incorrect statements regarding constitutional rights have added fuel to this perception. This not only potentially undermines New York City's long-standing sanctuary status but also challenges the basic understanding of constitutional protections within the context of immigration policy.
