Bay Area/ San Jose

Santa Clara County Court Rejects VTA's Injunction Bid Amid Ongoing Transit Strike

AI Assisted Icon
Published on March 17, 2025
Santa Clara County Court Rejects VTA's Injunction Bid Amid Ongoing Transit StrikeSource: Google Street View

In a recent twist to the ongoing transportation saga, Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Daniel T. Nishigaya has denied the Valley Transportation Authority's (VTA) plea for an injunction meant to swiftly stop the strike of its transit workers, a dispute that has seen bus and light rail operations halted across the county. The ruling, based on the VTA's failure to meet form filing requirements as per the state's procedural standards, offers only a reprieve to Amalgamated Transit Union Local 265, as the transit agency may reattempt to file their request.

The dispute, now intensifying into its second week of worker strikes, stems from failed contract negotiations between the VTA and the union. According to San José Spotlight, workers are demanding a 6% raise each year over three years, accounting for an 18% total increase, alongside the introduction of language in the contract that would establish a third-party conflict resolution process. The VTA, contending that the requested raises would necessitate service and staff cuts, has countered with a 9% increase spread over the same period and has not agreed to include the conflict resolution process.

The court's injunction denial has been met with measured optimism by union representatives who still lament the VTA’s decision to seek legal avenues over further negotiation efforts. "We have no control on the amount of time it would take for an injunction to even be heard, rather than actual judgement being issued," ATU Local 265 President Raj Singh told San José Spotlight. "It could take a day, several days, a week, and ultimately the public is the one that is suffering."

Commuters affected by the strike have had to find alternative travel solutions, creating ripple effects throughout Santa Clara County's transit systems. The strike's legality has been a point of contention, with VTA alleging a "no strike" clause in the expired collective bargaining agreement, a claim labeled as a "blatant about-face" by the union, according to The Mercury News. Judge Nishigaya will consider VTA’s request upon submission of a properly formatted filing, opening the door for potentially rapidly ending the strike should the injunction eventually be granted.