St. Louis

Former St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner Faces Disciplinary Panel Over Alleged Misuse of Public Funds

AI Assisted Icon
Published on December 10, 2025
Former St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner Faces Disciplinary Panel Over Alleged Misuse of Public FundsSource: Unsplash/ Sasun Bughdaryan

Kim Gardner, the former St. Louis Circuit Attorney, has had a spotlight placed firmly back upon her as she faced a disciplinary panel earlier this week, with the potential severity of consequences extending to the loss of her law license. This recent accountability measure comes after Gardner admitted to using funds from the Office’s contingent account for personal finance management related to a fine, according to details highlighted by a report from 5 On Your Side. The sum, amounting to $5,004.33, was designated for paying transcripts and other office-related expenses yet found its way into Gardner’s personal bank account.

The misuse of public funds for covering costs related to her state Supreme Court imposed fine for her 2018 prosecution of then-Governor Eric Greitens, put Gardner at the crosshairs of both federal and state disciplinary bodies. In a bid to circumvent a harsher sentence, Gardner entered an 18-month pre-charge diversion program with the U.S. Attorney's Office in October 2024. During the hearing, Assistant U.S. Attorney Hal Goldsmith took the stand, noting Gardner's lack of prior offenses and her subsequent resignation, First Alert 4 reported.

This spectacle played out within the chamber of the three-person disciplinary panel, where Gardner was flanked by defense teams and a band of steadfast supporters, among them the St. Louis City NAACP President, Adolphus Pruitt. In the face of accusations from the Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel, Gardner's attorneys have positioned her actions as not an anomaly but a part of a culture where the proper use of contingency funds was muddled, according to statements obtained by 5 On Your Side.

Harvard Law Professor Ronald Sullivan, serving as Gardner's attorney, contended that precedence for such reimbursements existed. He argued that Gardner's actions were rooted in a lingering confusion over office policy, a point reinforced by the testimony of another of Gardner's attorneys, Michael Downey. "Nothing here happened in the dark of night, nothing happened in the shadows," Sullivan stated, insisting on his client’s openness, as his words echoed in reports by First Alert 4.

Yet, Andrea Spillars, Acting Chief Disciplinary Counsel, contested such claims vigorously, elucidating the specific nature of the contingency fund and its intended purpose, far from covering attorney misconduct or disciplinary fees. With such divergent narratives presented, the panel now weighs Gardner's professional future, with a recommendation due within 30 days, and the Missouri Supreme Court holding the authority to make a final determination on her licensure status, as noted by a report from FOX 2 Now