
Ed Carpenter Racing just got a fresh green flag in its courtroom battle. An Indiana appeals court on Tuesday handed the Indianapolis-based IndyCar team a second chance on parts of its $8.4 million lawsuit against former sponsors, undoing pieces of a prior dismissal and sending key issues back to Marion County Superior Court. How well the team uses that do-over could decide whether it ever recoups the sponsorship money it says went missing in recent seasons.
What The Appeals Court Decided
The Court of Appeals agreed with the trial court that it does not have personal jurisdiction over Milton "Todd" Ault, a Nevada resident, but said the lower court went too far by dismissing Ed Carpenter Racing's claims with prejudice. The panel partially reversed and remanded, clearing the way for the team to file an amended complaint on certain counts while leaving other dismissals in place, according to the Court of Appeals of Indiana.
What ECR Says Happened
Ed Carpenter Racing filed its original complaint in May 2025, seeking $8.4 million and accusing the defendants of breaching a personal guaranty, breaching a sponsorship agreement, and being unjustly enriched. The team says it ran branding tied to companies controlled by Ault, including BitNile and RiskOn, across the 2022 to 2024 seasons and claims an unsigned 2024 sponsorship program was worth roughly $10 million, as reported by IndyStar.
Why Those Emails Did Not Cut It
In its opinion, the appellate panel said the negotiation emails Ed Carpenter Racing relied on were "insufficient to establish a valid contractual basis for personal jurisdiction over Defendant Ault" and noted that Indiana's Statute of Frauds requires a guarantor's signature. The judges also concluded that ECR had not pleaded plausible claims against VForward2 under Trial Rule 12(B)(6), although they gave the team a chance to fix those counts in an amended complaint, according to the opinion.
The Legal Hurdles Still Ahead
Practically speaking, the ruling means ECR will need more than back-and-forth messages to support any guaranty or contract theory. Appellate judges spelled out that plaintiffs must bring actual record evidence when they fight over jurisdiction. That will likely require affidavits, signed contracts, or other exhibits if ECR wants its revised filing to survive the next motion to dismiss, per Indiana Lawyer.
Inside The Team And The Local Stakes
The lawsuit is playing out as Ed Carpenter Racing reshapes itself behind the scenes. Ted Gelov joined as a co-owner in September 2024, and the team plans to move into a roughly 76,000 square foot facility in Westfield in early 2027, details reported by IndyStar. Coverage in Racer and other industry outlets has tracked how Ault-linked brands appeared on ECR cars in recent seasons, a factual thread that sits right at the heart of the dispute.
For now, ECR has a fresh opportunity to refile amended claims in Marion County. How quickly and how strongly it does so will determine whether the fight moves on to the substance of the sponsorship deal or fades on procedural grounds. Observers note that the amended complaint will be the real stress test for the team's case: if ECR can come up with documentary or testimonial evidence beyond email correspondence, the litigation could move forward, per Indiana Lawyer.









