
A seasonal tree sale can support a cause in different ways: proceeds may go directly to a charitable program, or a business may provide another benefit in connection with its sales. Coral Gables’ dispute over a longtime Christmas tree lot centers on which kind of benefit meets the city’s requirements. A separate example in Durango illustrates one direct-proceeds model, but it does not establish what Coral Gables’ rules require.
The San Juan Mountains Association says its Durango tree lot is scheduled to run from November 27 through December 18, 2026, with all proceeds supporting public-lands stewardship and conservation education. That is a different organization and arrangement—not evidence about the Coral Gables business or the city’s zoning standards, according to the association.
Two sides disagree on what counted as charity
In Coral Gables, Paul W. Boutin’s company agreed to pay the Coral Gables Firefighters Benevolent Association $30,000 for exclusive use of its name during tree sales from 2026 through 2030, the Miami Herald reported. City officials argued that the for-profit company was not associated with the association and that the arrangement did not direct sale proceeds to charity. They also said donated trees did not meet the zoning code’s requirement that proceeds from the sale go to charity.
The Herald reported that the operation donated $20,200 worth of trees to schools, nonprofits and government agencies in 2023 and 2024; the city’s position was that the gifts were not cash proceeds to local charities. Firehouse.com reported that the city asked Boutin to give a portion of sales proceeds in cash to Coral Gables charities, a conversation Boutin said did not happen.
Permit application withdrawn; outcome remains open
The application sought a zoning variance to sell trees in the parking lot of Coral Gables Baptist Church on Granada Boulevard. At its October 27 meeting, the city commission postponed a vote to allow more time for negotiations; later that day, Boutin withdrew the application, according to the Herald. Boutin told the newspaper he had spent about $130,000 preparing for the season.
The withdrawal ends this application, but the available reporting does not settle whether the naming-rights payment or donated trees satisfied the city’s charity requirement, or whether the operation will return in a future season. The Durango example shows one organization publicly describing a direct-proceeds approach; it cannot answer the local zoning question Coral Gables has left unresolved.









