Seattle

Tacoma Nurses Rip ICE Guards Over 'Atrociously Unsafe' St. Joseph's Care

AI Assisted Icon
Published on February 18, 2026
Tacoma Nurses Rip ICE Guards Over 'Atrociously Unsafe' St. Joseph's CareSource: Google Street View

Nurses at St. Joseph’s Medical Center in Tacoma say ICE agents bringing detainees to the hospital often ignore infection-control, privacy, and restraint standards, leading to unsafe conditions for patients and staff. They report agents staying in rooms during intimate care and keeping patients tightly shackled, sometimes causing visible injuries and distress. The concerns have prompted unions and immigrant-rights advocates to call for clearer hospital policies and greater public accountability.

Documents and testimony reviewed by reporters include seven workplace complaints from St. Joseph’s nurses. Those accounts describe incidents that range from an agent tightening handcuffs so severely that a doctor recorded “notable indentation and bruising” and numbness in two fingers, to an agent allegedly leaving a gun unattended in a hospital bathroom and guards removing masks inside an infection-control area. Nurses say they raised those incidents with management and repeatedly asked for written protocols and guidance about custodial escorts. As reported by KUOW, the hospital’s owner declined to answer detailed questions about restraint policies and said, “Our focus in every situation is the same: ensuring patients receive appropriate medical care in a safe and respectful environment.”

The state nurses union has publicly seized on the paperwork and the gun allegation, calling the situation dangerous and a reason to reconsider how custodial presence works in clinical settings. The Washington State Nurses Association labeled the gun episode “atrociously unsafe” and said it will join community partners in a protest this week to push for clear, enforceable rules.

What Federal Standards Require and What Watchdogs Find

Performance-based detention standards require timely access to emergency and hospital care for people in ICE custody and include rules on medical privacy, restraint use and off-site treatment. Yet oversight reviews and academic analyses have found a persistent gap between those written standards and what happens on the ground, especially when care is delivered outside detention facilities. PubMed Central has published a recent review outlining the PBNDS medical standards, while the Government Accountability Office has recommended stronger ICE oversight of off-site informed consent and documentation for community medical care.

Advocates Say Sicker Detainees Are Being Sent To Town

Local immigrant-rights groups point to the nearby Northwest ICE Processing Center as part of the picture. Legal advocates say the facility holds many detainees with complex medical needs and that it has become harder to win medical-release requests that would allow people to receive treatment in the community. KUOW reporting quoted an attorney who said medical-release requests for complex cases are now “rarely approved,” a change that advocates say is funneling sicker people into hospitals like St. Joseph’s. The Northwest Immigrant Rights Project has tracked transfers and legal filings tied to the facility and provides guides for families trying to locate and assist people in custody.

Legal And Oversight Implications

That mix of rising numbers of medically complex detainees, custody requirements and spotty coordination with community providers raises legal and regulatory questions for hospitals, ICE and the Department of Homeland Security. Federal reviewers have urged ICE to tighten oversight of off-site medical care and to ensure detention facilities collect informed-consent documentation and enforce standards around restraints and transfers. Those recommendations highlight the practical gap that nurses at community hospitals say they are confronting on the floor.

What Nurses Want Next

Nurses and union leaders say they want clear, written protocols that limit custodial presence during intimate care, spell out restraint use and protect patient privacy. Many say they prefer custodial supervision to happen outside medical settings whenever possible. Union organizers and community groups plan public demonstrations to press the hospital and state officials for changes while continuing to document incidents and file workplace complaints. For now, front-line staff say they will keep pushing for transparent rules that put patient care and dignity ahead of custody procedures.